Slashdot Mirror


Software Sorts Electronic Evidence

securitas writes: "The New York Times has a very interesting article about the legal industry using new search software to sort through electronic evidence such as e-mail, documents and recovered files, and the process that they go through to make the evidence usable. It has spawned an industry."

21 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. Michael Sims is a Censor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    The Slashdot is Still Censorware FAQ, v1.1

    Q: What is this all about?

    Despite the fact that the Slashdot FAQ claims the editors "never" delete comments, proof exists that they have deleted comments on occasion:

    Notice the first comment in the cached version of the story is an ASCII graphic, which had been modded up to +1 at the last minute before the story was archived. That comment is now gone. As you can see, the comment was posted by this user. Notice the user info page now says the account has posted zero comments. All comments posted by that account, regardless of moderation score, have been wiped.

    Q: Didn't the comment just get modded down?

    No, the comment is gone. It is nowhere to be found in the current version of the story. One must go to the Google cache to view it.

    Q: Maybe it got modded down just before the story was archived, and is now gone because comments at 0 and below don't get archived?

    No, the story had already been frozen into Slashdot's static HTML archive. Look at that Google cached copy again. It clearly says:

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

    That also means no more moderation could take place. The comment did not get modded down, it was deleted.

    Q: So? It's their site, they can delete comments if they want to!

    True. But it's also true that I can criticize them for being liars. Here is what the Slashdot FAQ says about the deletion of comments:

    The only time we ever delete comments is if the comment contains malformed HTML that is somehow causing Slashdot to fail to display properly. Comments are not deleted on the basis of content. [emphasis added]

    As you can see from the Google cache, the comment displayed just fine in a standard browser. It was not deleted because it contained malformed HTML. It was deleted for no reason, save that they didn't like it. That is in direct conflict with the statements in the FAQ.

    Q: Yeah well, that comment was an ASCII representation of goatse.cx, which is disgusting. I'm glad it's gone.

    Odd that you find the human body "disgusting". Do you take showers with your eyes closed so you won't have to look at it?

    Q: Look, that comment was posted by a troll; it was modded up by trolls, and therefore it was invalid!

    I once again redirect your attention to the Slashdot FAQ. Slashdot brags about being user-moderated. The comment was posted and moderated up by users. How is that invalid?

    Q: Because! I said it's a troll! Didn't you hear me?!

    Whatever.

    Q: Well, why are you posting this? What do you want them to do about it? What are you trying to prove?

    The point of all this is that Slashdot's model of anonymous posting, never deleting comments, and purely user-based moderation doesn't work. They are, in fact, aware of this -- hence the deletion of comments (not to mention the vast number of comments modded down by editors rather than users).

    There is nothing wrong with the administrator of a message board taking steps, even ruthless ones, to eliminate crap. In fact, most successful message boards on the web are run in this manner. However, since the Slashdot editors refuse to acknowledge this, and still publicly maintain their fantasy of a working user-regulated system, I think it's pretty funny to go around pointing out their hypocrisy and dishonesty.

    Q: Don't you have better things to do?

    Yeah, but I'm not doing them right now, am I?

    Note: This FAQ is public domain. Copy-and-paste it to your heart's content. It is not released under the GPL.

    First post?

    1. Re:Michael Sims is a Censor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      You're very correct, too bad it'll be modded into -1 oblivion. I never thought I'd be congratulating an AC on the first post, but good fp.

      -- evil_spork

    2. Re:Michael Sims is a Censor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I just realized something, the /. trolls are the people who hang out on the Somethingawful.com message boards. They have to be. please don't mod this down, I know it is off topic, but I uncovered something usefull here.

  2. Oh yeaH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Two million some odd post, mutha fucka!

  3. fifth ps0t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    rar..!! cmdrTaco can suck my ass!

  4. No more New York Times until registration removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    "If you vote, it only encourages them."

    Running daily stories from the NYT only encourages them to continue the stupid registration thing.

    Instead, ignore them until they *get real* and find a way to support their online endeavors without it.

    When their advertisers realize that it's an impediment, they'll demand that it be removed.

  5. Re:AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    They'll just ban your IP/account for three days. They lied for the longest time and claimed they were 24 hour bans, but they actually lasted three days and their message has just been changed, I believe, to reflect the three days. I haven't seen even the most frequent troll accounts recently get bitchslapped, but maybe I haven't been watching closely enough. Anyways, just thought I'd let you know.

    -- evil_spork

  6. Re:No more New York Times until registration remov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You're a fucking idiot. You should be grateful that you get all of their content for free anyway. They don't have to give it away to freeloaders like you if they don't want to.

    Stop bitching and grow up.

    -sting3r

  7. Re:AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This is the worst possible way to hurt the trolls. An IP ban if you've been moderated down 5 times in 24 hours? Most trolls are already -1, so they don't get moderated down. Yet another folly of the moderation system.

  8. Re:OpenBSD fucked up my hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    try fdisk/mbr. If that doesn't work, try finding a low-level format program for your hard drive.

  9. These are not the droids you are looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You never seen such a den of trolls geeks and lamers.

  10. Re:OpenBSD fucked up my hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    He shouldn't have to low level format anything. If fdisk/mbr isn't the problem, he could just re-run the BSD partitioning and create a FAT partition or whatever. I've used BSD to fix partition problems, I've never had BSD *cause* a partition problem.

  11. That smell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Is driving me crazy. I am really getting hungry I haven't had any lunch today.

  12. If you only knew the power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    of the troll side

  13. Soon the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    will be crushed and the trollinator will be ours.

  14. Re:OpenBSD fucked up my hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    OpenBSD fdisk -i /dev/rwd0a didn't help.

  15. To the slashdot crew: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Archive the story after a random number of days between n and 2*n. This will help a lot, because right now trolls track stories that will get archived soon, ordinary people don't have the patience for such things.

  16. Re:ALERT: This is not a troll despite the moderati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Actually, I'd like to see the -1 comments archived as well (separately of course). I'd be curious to compare today's troll with what they looked like last year. But right now I can't! This is because CmdrTaco wants future historians to think that Slashdot has always been a clean place where smart people discussed intelligently the topic at hand.

  17. YAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    VA Linux just hit an all time low of 1.26!!

    Oh yeah baby!

    1. Re:YAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Oh yeah. The market has got more shorts going than Miami.

  18. au contrair, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Future historians will puzzle over why, since /. was such a bastion of erudition in the past, that it's backslid into such a cesspit of trollocity today. This will lead to several very interesting (although flawed) theories.