Software Aesthetics
cconnell writes: "Most software design is lousy. Most software is so bad, in fact, that if it were a bridge, no one in his or her right mind would walk across it. If it were a house, we would be afraid to enter. The only reason we (software engineers) get away with this scam is the general public cannot see inside of software systems. If software design were as visible as a bridge or house, we would be hiding our heads in shame. This article is a challenge to engineers, managers, executives and software users (which is everyone) to raise our standards about software. We should expect the same level of quality and performance in software we demand in physical construction. Instead of trying to create software that works in a minimal sense, we should be creating software that has internal beauty." We had a good discussion on a related topic half a year ago.
Sometimes, when you see some beatyfull software design, the tears start to fall.
I've certainly worked with software that made me want to cry, but not because it was well designed.
To steal from the Murray boys, if good code makes you cry, stay the hell away from anything on the Lifetime network. 'Cause you'll have to go on Zoloft to get over Steel Magnolias.
Pussy.
Your friend,
--Shoeboy