Choosing a Router/Firewall for the Home LAN

Dr. Zowie asks: "How should one choose a router for a home LAN? We just added a few hosts on our home ethernet, which is connected via DSL. There are an amazing number of new entries into the market for routers and even stand-alone firewalls. NetGear, Linksys, SMC, and even Panasonic all have boxen in the $99-$300 range, each of which will do some combination of NAT, routing, source-IP filtering, port filtering, and content filtering."

"It's not at all obvious from the packaging, the web sites, or the drool-proof pamphlets in the boxes which routers will do what. For example, we'd like to pass through packets for our two server machines, and use NAT/DHCP on a third address for the rest of the LAN. Nearly all the boxes advertise that they can do NAT routing, but many don't support NAT and static-IP routing simultaneously.

Die-hards will insist that one should run a standalone box with dual ethernet cards and the appropriate routing goodies -- but these standalone boxes, at 5-15 watts and a couple hundred bucks, seem like comparatively hassle-free solution. Which one do you use?"

Comments

Score -1, Flamebait

[trauma]

God, do all you "old PC NAT box" folks have fears about your manhood or do you just not read? The man clearly stated that he was looking for info on router appliances, and just as clearly excluded homebuilt PCs as a topic of discussion, but everybody and their brother still has to trot out the damn things, perhaps to demonstrate their questionable 1337tness by tossing it off so casually, as if it were a trivial solution (which it can be, in terms of technical difficulty. But the man mentioned $$$ and watts).

God help us when you all have actual beowolf clusters in your basements to brag about at every opportunity...

Re:Old PC

[IronChef]

But you also need to know OpenBSD. People who are not interested in being sysadmins have a right to NAT too!

There are also people who do not want to, or do not know HOW to assemble a cheap PC from parts. There is no shame in a "black box" solution.

Re:Old PC

[Manitcor]

I think you are missing the point. Yes it may be the best solution to set up a PC. The person asking the question however wants to know which out of the box solution is best. Not what do-it-yourself solution is best.

How is it so many smart people have so much trouble reading?

Best deal - most features - lowest price

[jbridges]

TigerDirect has the 3COM 3c510 NAT Router for $49, no rebates, that's the real price!

It includes:

1 port WAN (DSL/Cable Modem)
4 port 10/100 Switch
Parallel port with Print server
Serial port with FAX and dialout sharing support.

Why so cheap? It's a discontinued model.

BUT... the insides are exactly the same as models sold by SMC, D-LINK and others, and you can use the drivers and firmware upgrade from the original maker (AMIT) in Taiwan which you can find here:

http://www.amit.com.tw/download/firmware/

The printer server works with standard LPD support in Linux.

Electricity Costs

[billstewart]

Your old PC probably burns 100 watts. At a nice round but too low number of 10 cents/kwh, that's a penny an hour. So that's $1.68/week, or about $7.20/month, or $87.60/year. By contrast, most Cheap Little Routers cost under $100, so they're in the same price range. The real cost differences are your time installing the thing - if you view it as entertainment, along with the enjoyment of laughing at hax0rs, you win. If you view it as 15 minutes of your time at $200/your, you lose, unless it saves you half an hour of hauling the antique to the Computer Recycling Center, in which case you also win.