Slashdot Mirror


You Cannot Turn it Off: News Addiction

BizangoBob writes: "In this time of madness, I find myself staying up later than usual, watching more tv than ever before, tracking more channels, with more open browser windows than even I did before. As though KNOWING more will somehow help. There's a great piece about news addiction in the Washington Post. It made me feel I'm not the only one."

5 of 487 comments (clear)

  1. more please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somebody please post more links to stories about news addiction!

  2. A suggestion by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A comment i just sent to Rob Malda (after a short bit of praise for him and his team):

    - Please consider making a "permanent" story -- or call it a forum. When i
    want to post something about the tragedy, i'm forced to choose between three
    options, none of which is great: I can submit a story, and odds are great
    that you will have to reject it. I can post a comment to an old story, where
    it will likely be missed since the story is off the front page and will
    certainly be missed when the next update is posted. Or, i can wait for the
    next update and hope i hit it early.

    If you had one huge permanent story instead of lots of smaller ones, people
    would sort by "Newest First" to get news, which is what they should do
    instead of just waiting for the next story to be posted. It lets new +1 and
    +2 comments have a chance regardless of how early they're posted.

    Also, raising the maximum comment rating above 5, if technically feasable,
    would really help in these stories, where dozens and dozens of comments are
    rated at 5...

  3. Jeremy Glick, from Dateline by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most powerful and moving coverage of Jeremy Glick's story, from Dateline NBC: http://www.msnbc.com/news/629077.asp

    Please read. Please mod up so people will see.

  4. Manufacturing Consent by surfimp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've turned off my television and stopped visiting CNN.com and all the rest of the mainstream media outlets. I'm becoming extremely disturbed by the direction which they've been heading since rougly 20 minutes after the second plane hit, and (as I recall) even before the first WTC tower fell.

    The talk is of reprisal, and how the United States is going to respond to the attacks. Granted, nothing can justify what has happened, and there is no rationalization for what was done. However, could we perhaps get a bit wider perspective or perhaps even some critical thought/discussion regarding what has happened from CNN?

    Today there was a poll on CNN.com that makes my point perfectly: "If Afghanistan refuses to hand over Osama bin Laden, should the U.S. bomb Kabul?" 79% of respondents said yes, we should bomb Kabul.

    Hello, my fellow citizens! The people of Afghanistan are currently living under the tyrannical rule of the Taliban, having just come out of a long and very punishing war with the former Soviet Union. Not only has all the major infrastructure *already* been bombed, but the people are suffering tremendously as it currently stands.

    Even more to the point, what could "we" possibly gain by bombing Kabul, which is a CITY full of CIVILIANS, after all? Does it make any difference whether it's a cruise missle or jetliner causing the explosion? Do you think the Taliban government, the only ones with access to food and equipment, will still be in Kabul when the bombs start to drop? Hardly--they'll be off in the hills with bin Laden, and the only people left to suffer the brunt of such an assault would be the civilian population.

    The point I'm trying to make is that the mainstream media is so caught up in the idea that we could bomb Afghanistan that they've forgotten whether or not we should. After all, the only real way that we'll get bin Laden (or whomever is responsible for these crimes) out is by _going_in_after_them_. That will cost American and NATO lives. And, it can be aruged that it runs the high risk of polarizing other Muslim nations against what they could only perceive as an invasion by the West.
    And if you've actually read anything about what bin Laden is trying to accomplish with his terrorist agenda, it's EXACTLY that--a world war between Islam and the West. And remember, Pakistan has nuclear bombs at their disposal.

    Where is there any discussion of these facts in the mainstream media? That is what I truly fear, more than anything else. The manufacturing of our consent to what amounts to acts of genocide against civilian populations--and that ultimately leads to only greater and greater violence.

    Try: http://www.zmag.org

  5. Umm, maye you should think by N8F8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could it be possile that the military doesn't pick it's targets baed on CNN polls?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power