Slashdot Mirror


Apache Tomcat 4.0 Final Released

A reader writes "The latest version of the Apache Java Servlet engine has been released. 'The 4.0 release implements the Servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2 specifications.' Read more at The Apache Group's Jakarta site."

4 of 288 comments (clear)

  1. J2EE-ish support? (for java CA) by coyote-san · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm currently working on a certificate authority written with servlets (and JNI calls to libopenssl for the gory work of actually creating and signing the X.509 certs), and everything is using EJB beans. The goal is to have the CA entity beans handle the actual CA and X.509 tasks, another set of beans and JSP to handle the web and java client interfaces, and yet another set of beans to handle the business rules regarding content and issuance of the certs, and tying it all together with J2EE or something similar.

    The only problem is that I seem to be missing a piece of the puzzle. For now, I'm creating and initializing the beans explicitly, but shouldn't this be handled automatically somewhere/somehow? I'm sure I'm just missing some small piece of information in this huge pile. Does this release address this problem, or is it an entirely different set of code?

    (As a related aside, I'm gonna stop using Debian if it continues to have such long release cycles. I eventually got suitable openssl (0.9.6), postgres (7.0) and java (1.3) installed, but it took days and a lot of pain because of the length of the "to do A you must first do B, to do B you must first do C, to do... chain.)

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  2. Tomcat As the Anti.NET? by Lethyos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This project seems that it could fill the role of a great that that Sun wanted to accomplish with Java. The versatility of Servlets is quite extensive and it makes me wonder why, in the shadow of this project, the OSS community is spending time on dotGNU and Mono.

    Tomcat has tremendous potential to deliver robust, complete apps in the same way .NET wants to. And, it's not restricted to Windows.

    Is my thinking correct in that we can level this software against Microsoft's upcoming ventures? Can we make a .NET killer out of this, or am I thinking about driving a screw with a hammer?

    --
    Why bother.
  3. Why use PHP? by heretic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not trying to indulge in a religious war, but I'm curious as to why PHP is so popular when JSP provides a much more robust solution. IMO, JavaScript is a real language compared to PHP's half-hearted C-like syntax, and it implements a real object model, again unlike PHP. I'm also uncomfortable with Zend's pricing scheme for their optimizer, whereas I can choose to use a JVM with JIT when using JSP at no cost. I also don't need to worry about proprietary caching schemes.

  4. JRun is better... by hendridm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I dunno, Tomcat's configuration is horrible and I couldn't get it to run as a service on Windows, which is worthless. JRun has a very simple configuration interface, works well, and doesn't require editing of cryptic text files. They also have a free version available for development.

    IMO, Simplicity isn't necessarily a bad thing...