BugTraq's Elias Levy Talks Security
LiquidPC writes: "UnderLinux.com.br has an
interview with the BugTraq moderator, Elias Levy or Aleph1. Questions ranging from what he thinks of 'Hacking Exposed' to whether BSD is more secure than Linux. Kind of short, but interesting nonetheless." He notes the interesting difference between the approaches to security taken by FreeBSD (which he praises) and Linux -- lots of projects vs. a single unified one, and emphasizes that security is ongoing, not defeating any single problem.
[simon@beesianum simon]$ cat /var/log/httpd/*access* | grep msadc | wc -l
133
Not bad for a worm that's been live for less than seven hours, and attacks an operating system that's 'easy to secure'.
I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
This is why you shouldn't use an MS designed languages like VB or C#.
/" in perl, python, and ruby. MS ships IIS in a bloody awful configuration for security, and it may not be possible to totally secure it, but the herring you're waving around is redder than Kruschev (there's a dated joke).
Show me a buffer overflow attack on the VB VM. Just one. Attacks on the system? Watch me write "rm -rf $HOME
I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
I just wonder what is different about the training of *nix admins that makes them recognize that vigilance must be eternal, while the admins of other OSes seem to assume everything will go right when that is clearly not the case.
Dave