Slashdot Mirror


SirCam on Linux via WINE

illusion_2K writes "Another monumental step forward for Linux - the SirCam virus now works on Linux via WINE. ("With a few ommissions")" Allright I had to post it. Thats damn funny. We can emulate worms if we want to!

14 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. When? by flikx · · Score: 4, Funny

    When will I be able to enjoy being infected by outlook viruses under FreeBSD? People will think I'm weird if I don't send along personal documents.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  2. Now let's fix it by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cool! Now for a real coup, alter WINE so that it doesn't have all these vulnerabilities. (Should be reasonably straight-forward, just put proper checks in to keep VB scripts from accessing certain parts of the system.) I can see the marketing now: "Runs all Windows programs, except the viruses!" "It's Windows, but safer." "Virii? We don't run no steenkin virii!"

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  3. The major barrier to virii... by gusnz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, all we need is an Outlook user simulator package that automatically opens executable attachments if it's asked for advice :)

  4. Not Quite by Jerry · · Score: 5, Informative

    While I noticed that SirCam infected email did fire my Wine program the results were a dud. The effect was that SirCam was exposed but not functional, and I was able to explore it's code without fear. There were no registries to infect, no exchange list to exploit, and the "hidden" trojans were easily seen and removed.

    SirCam it totally harmless on Linux under Wine.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  5. [W]ine [I]s [N]ot an [E]mulator by Puk · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet this comes up with every wine post, but according to the name, the sourceforge page, and one of the the FAQ answers, WINE is not an emulator. Much like GNU is not UNIX. :)

    -Puk

    1. Re:[W]ine [I]s [N]ot an [E]mulator by Puk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fair enough -- you've got a good point. We should be able to come up with something more concise than that thing, though. :) How about "now Linux can suck as much as Windows" or "now we can run those superior Windows worms"?

      "You have been hit by the UNIX virus! It works on the honor system. Please forward this message to everyone you know and delete a bunch of your files at random."

      Ah, what the hell, it's fine as it is. ;)

      -Puk

  6. Great by LazyDawg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now even Linux users can enjoy the benefits of the Microsoft Virus Infection Layer in their otherwise high quality operating system.

    This is a big step for Linux's acceptance as a Desktop operating system. We NEED more clueless newbies out there using Linux and saying "fuckit, I think there's a virus on your/my system. Time to reinstall KDE."

    In a few months even Outlook will be available to Linux/Wine users, so too will be the full Universal Virus Infection suite of tools from Microsoft.

    My only question is, how much longer until we have kernel-level support for VBA and Microsoft Scripting?

    --
    "Look at me, I invented the stove!" -- Ben Franklin
  7. Sue them? by aozilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just wonder, all those people who advocate suing Microsoft for the SirCam virus, should we now sue the makers of WINE as well?

    --
    ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  8. Makes perfect sense to me... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My original point (which has been moderated into oblivion, as I assume this will be too) is that it doesn't make ANY rational sense to be trying to get a MALICIOUS program running on your system.

    It makes perfect sense to me, with a couple of changes of emphasis.

    It makes sense, when writing an emulator/compatability layer, to TEST whether a malicious program will run, for two reasons:

    Discovering whether the emulation is close enough that the emulator is also vulnerable to the malicious software.

    Discovering whether the malicious software fails because it depends on a feature - necessary for some NON-malicious programs - which is not correctly emulated. (A malicious program may use a little-known or undocumented "feature" - perhaps one that's been keeping some popular apps from working correctly.)

    But beyond debugging the emulation there are additional reasons:

    Running the malicious program in the (open-source) emulation environment may provide additional insight into its operation, leading to better defenses, both for the emulation and the original environment.

    It's FUNNY!

    That's four separate reasons that this makes sense.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  9. Done that.. by sakusha · · Score: 4, Informative

    This has been a known problem for years amongst Mac emulator users. Virtual PC and other emus are suceptible to viruses just like on a native PC. I just run standard PC antivirus tools.

    One of the advantages of using Mac PC emulation, I can just make a backup copy of my PC volume, save that state, if I have a Windows problem I just ditch the corrupted volume and use the backup.

  10. Emulating bugs by os2fan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One of the things about Win-OS/2 was that it was bug for bug compatible with Windows, even down to emulating the 3.11-3.10=0.00 bug in the calculator.

    The sad thing about Windows bugs is that you don't need to go to the back door to do damage. There's enough to be seen to do it through the front door now.

    Maybe SirCam did not work because when the damage was passed down to the underlying OS, Linux did not want to play ball: and isn't that WHY we run emulators.... :)

    --
    OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
  11. what to reply to a dork who sends you sircam by zyqqh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    here's my form letter for replying to addresses i get sircam clones from:

    +++
    Subject: advice

    Hi! How are you?

    I send you this advice in order to not have your files

    See you later. Thanks
    +++
    Attachment (named advice.txt.bat):

    @echo off

    echo Your computer is infected with the "sircam" virus, and has been
    echo repeatedly emailing addresses on hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu
    echo with large attachments. Please clean up the virus ASAP.
    echo You can find more information on how to do this at:
    echo http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.sircam. worm@mm.html

    :Loop
    goto Loop

    --
    // zyqqh
  12. Another historic milestone by dsplat · · Score: 4, Informative
    I can't believe that no one has posted a reference to the Jargon File entry for the bug-compatibility standard that WINE has now met:

    bug-compatible adj.


    [common] Said of a design or revision that has been badly compromised by a requirement to be compatible with fossil s or misfeature s in other programs or (esp.) previous releases of itself. "MS-DOS 2.0 used \ as a path separator to be bug-compatible with some cretin's choice of / as an option character in 1.0."


    --
    The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  13. Re:If I see another moron use "virii"... by Tony-A · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, the plural of virus is Microsoft.