Slashdot Mirror


Biometrics in Airports

asv108 writes: "Extremetech has an article by renowned security expert Bruce Schneier about why face recognition in public places such as airports is not a good idea." Schneier is being generous - real world results show that facial recognition systems are a lot less than 99.99% accurate even under laboratory conditions (people posing for the camera under ideal lighting).

2 of 413 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Enemy of the State? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to the FAS website, the KH-12 "IMPROVED CRYSTAL", which is the best the US has in orbit, can..."readily identify and distinguish differing types of vehicles and equipment with resolutions better than 10 centimeters."

    So unless you are playing with big cards, I doubt the Man can read your hand.

    The optical sensors like KH-11/KH-12 can't see through clouds, so they also have the Lacrosse series, which use Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to image thier targets.

    http://www.fas.org/spp/military/program/imint/la cr osse.htm
    http://www.fas.org/spp/military/program/imint/kh -1 2.htm

  2. Re:Biometrics are coming.... by wurp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anthrax isn't deliverable by water. Your worst fear should be clouds of anthrax delivered via air, since anthrax:
    *lasts 30-40 years in the open
    *is easy to produce
    *is infectious in miniscule amounts
    *when inhaled is nearly 100% fatal once symptoms occur, regardless of treatment
    *the US government isn't letting anyone but the military be vaccinated!

    Vaccination appears to provide a 95%+ immunity to airborn anthrax (evidence is sketchy for humans, since we don't experiment with infecting the vaccinated ;) If we don't have enough vaccine for everyone, why the hell not? Anthrax has been well known to be a major bio warfare hazard for years, and the vaccine has likewise been known for years. Livestock handlers and livestock have been getting vaccinated for anthrax for ages.