Slashdot Mirror


Consumer Hydrogen Fuel Cells

axis-techno-geek writes: "Ballard Power Systems of Vancouver, BC (in Canada, eh), has stated that it will start production this friday of their consumer level Nexa(tm) hydrogen fuel cell (article here). The power module generates up to 1200 watts of unregulated DC electrical power that can keep going as long as it is supplied with hydrogen, and produces no toxic by-products (i.e. you can use it in your home). They also have plans for a 250kW unit. No price as of yet."

5 of 518 comments (clear)

  1. distributed power by rakerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think there is an enormous opportunity for North America to move to a distributed power system. Imagine this: natural gas feeds into your basement fuel cell, where you generate electricity for your entire house, plus you crack some of the natural gas into hydrogen during the day, to fill up your fuel cell car when you connect it overnight. Wired's article The Energy Web has similar ideas (and an opening paragraph that is now quite eerie).

  2. Only lasts 1500 hours. by A+Commentor · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The power module generates up to 1200 watts of unregulated DC electrical power that can keep going as long as it is supplied with hydrogen


    If that is the case why do they list a 'Lifetime' of 1500 hours? That's only ~62 days.. definitely not as long as it is supplied with hydrogen
    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

  3. Requires Alternative Hydrogen Sources by tbmaddux · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the original article: "...the company sees a future for the products as the world looks for alternative energy sources to reduce reliance on oil and natural gas." and "zero-emission fuel cells combine hydrogen - which can be obtained from methanol, natural gas, petroleum or renewable sources..."

    A fuel cell is only truly zero-emission if it is catalyzing hydrogen gas from zero-emission sources. 95% of our current supply of hydrogen comes from natural gas. So currently the fuel cell is only as clean as the natural gas reforming plant, effectively "burning" that gas and releasing CO2.

    They're a great idea, but they're not zero-emission yet.

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  4. The biggest problems got left out of the article by CodeShark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Which are also by the way the so called "hydrogen economy" still hasn't been created: 1) there is still no relatively inexpensive and safe way to store hydrogen at the consumer level, and 2) producing H2 from water doesn't make sense in terms of the economics: for liquid or gaseous fuels it is still much more energy efficient to convert ag wastes or coal to synthetic gases and fuels than to produce pure hydrogen.

    Now then, if you really wanted to get me excited.... you'd be talking about a consumer grade 5 Kw or so Fuel cell that could operate with good efficiency using a high grade of Bio-diesel. Which BTW can be made from virtually any vegetable oil or even oil derived from diatom algae. Of course, you'd have to learn to make your own fuel from the leftover peanut oil that the local burger joint cooked it's fries, in, but fortunately, the book with the recipe for how to do it isn't that hard to obtain...

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  5. 5 year warranties and full of toxins? by BillyGoatThree · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Solar panels are currently nasty silicon things made with all sorts of toxins. That would be OK if they would last forever, but they are generally on the five year plan."

    If you buy a solar panel new from a reputable manufacturer (say, Siemens) it will come with at least a 20 year warranty. That is, they will replace it if it falls 10% below it's rated wattage output any time within 20 years. And they pretty much picked "20" out of the air since they have no idea how long they'll last--all they're sure of is that it'll be more than 20 years.

    Furthermore, depending on where you install it (Arizona vs Maine, say) it will produce the same amount of power required to build it in 2-7 years. In other words, however much toxins it puts out, it can clean them up before it's half-dead. A net gain. These are actual working numbers, not theory.

    Solar power at ground level approx 1kW/m^2. Market available panels are 15-20% efficient which is 150-200W/m^2, not 22. And laboratory panels have been pumped up to 30% which would be 300W.

    I'm not some whacko greenie that thinks nuclear power will kill us all. I'm just somebody that adheres to the KISS principle: the sun is already generating billions of times more power than we could ever use--why not tap into it with a simple collector rather than reinventing the wheel here on earth?

    --
    324006