Slashdot Mirror


Netcraft Survey Updated

The latest survey is out and ready for reading from Netcraft. There's some interesting commentary in regards to Code Red, and its effects on web usage. One of the things that I found most interesting was the data showing that while the number of sites hosted by Apache continues to grow, the number of physical webservers running some variety of Windows is about half of the total. Worth checking out.

7 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Re:Code Red / Nimda by JatTDB · · Score: 5, Informative

    The next time someone asks if you have Norton, say yes. Geez...it's not like this is hard. If he's clueless, how is he going to verify it?

    --
    "That's Tron. He fights for the Users."
  3. Re:Interesting also is that i86 is WAY ahead... by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wouldn't it be event more deadly than a simple IIS targeted one ?

    No, because you can't arbitrarily execute x86 machine code on my x86-based server. You have to exploit a hole first, then get your code to execute. Since I run Apache instead of IIS, it's much harder for you to get into my system, and since I run Linux (properly configured) instead of Windows (misconfigured by a PHB who thinks the pretty dialog boxes make him a sysadmin), it's harder for you to do significant damage if you do get your code to run (because Apache setuids itself to a non-root user).

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  4. netcraft isn't stupid.... by mattdm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Netcraft isn't stupid.... see netcraft mechanics and how many active sites are there?.

  5. Quit spreading FUD or clarify your comments by crisco · · Score: 3, Informative

    IIS is NOT installed by default in W2K Pro.

    --

    Bleh!

  6. Re:Methodologies are important by KnightStalker · · Score: 4, Informative
    See here for server statistics on the top 1000 linked sites.

    Executive summary:
    Apache 41%
    Unknown 18%
    IIS 13%
    Netscape Enterprise 12%

    --
    * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  7. Switching privilege levels by Arker · · Score: 3, Informative

    There actually is a "good" reason that even people that know better often do this on NT(aka 2k). If you're sitting there word processing, logged in as a non-admin, and someone calls you and needs, let's say, a new account made for the new hire - you must close out of your program, log out of windows, log back in, then make the account. It's a pain. Whereas on a *nix box it's as it should be, you just open an xterm, su, and make the account. It's very handy to be able to change the user in a controlled way like that in an existing session, without affecting the other stuff you are doing.


    Another reason that this is done a lot is that there are a lot of NT admins out there that just don't know what they are doing. You tell them you need two accounts and they think you're trying to scam them. These people are just jokes, but if they happen to be over you in the local hierarchy there isn't often a lot you can do about them. So you do it their way, and just hope you don't get hit when it hits the fan.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.