Slashdot Mirror


FTC Shuts Down 'Pop-Up Trapping' Sites

Masem writes: "The FTC today ordered the shutdown of 5,500 sites owned by John Zuccarini, all of them the so-called 'typo' sites that common mis-entered URLs for popular sites (such as Annakurnikova.com); when the user visits these sites, their back button behavior in most popular browsers is modified as to open multiple pop-ups featuring ads for adult entertainment and gambling sites when pressed, and uses other technology to basically 'trap' the browser until the entire application has to be closed. While some sites are still operating, the FTC is going to take this matter to court, which may decide exactly how much control a web site can take over the end browser using JavaScript and ActiveX. CNet has the full story." Le Marteau contributes a link to the same story at the Washington Post.

3 of 442 comments (clear)

  1. The FTC regulates trade by tester13 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a great thing. The FTC protects people from fraud and other illegal business practices. That is what they are doing in this instance. The FCC regulates the airwaves, television, and so forth.

    The government isn't "getting involved in the internet" in any new creative way. They are just protecting consumers (us) from fraudulent illegal business practices

    Next time get the FCC FTC thing correct before you post, it completely changes the context of the article.

  2. unauthorised javascript by rpeppe · · Score: 5, Informative
    this issue is interesting: a colleague at work was today
    looking for a bug in some Javascript (we maintain
    our own web browser), and after delving down
    through the deliberately obfuscated javascript
    code, it became obvious what it was trying to do:


    it went through all links in the document, attaching
    a javascript "front-end" to each link that did an http GET request
    informing the remote site what had been clicked on,
    before actually following the link. the technique
    used seemed fairly dodgy (the request was purporting
    to be for a non-displayed image), but it's interesting
    to see what a fairly reputable site is prepared
    to do in order to get as much information off you as possible (without your knowledge).


    how reasonable is that? i don't like it, but is that sort
    of subterfuge the kind of thing we'd like to stop too?


    [PS. apologies if this appears twice - it looked like /.
    had rejected the previous ones; and then the whole
    server seemed to crash: what was going on there then?]

  3. New Browser Windows by leinerj · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay - I'll probally get flammed for this. But if you are using Internet Explorer you can start up IE with the -new command and have each browser open in a seperate process. That way, your main browser won't lock up or be forced to 'end task' if your popup windows get out of control.