Slashdot Mirror


Gnome 2.0 Alpha 1 Released

Dave H writes "The first pre-release of the GNOME 2 platform is now available! Find it at you can grab it from FTP.gnome.org It is of course a technology preview; note that it can't be installed alongside GNOME 1.x." There's some more information information posted on LinuxToday.

7 of 315 comments (clear)

  1. Gnomes by crumbz · · Score: 0, Funny

    I always play Dwarves. They usually have a better constitution the gnomes or halflings.

  2. Love the warning by wiredog · · Score: 5, Funny
    WARNING: This release does not include anything of use to end
    users.

    That could be put on half or more of the stuff on my box.

  3. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    All you need to get then is a mature OS gor your GUI.

  4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    interesting race between KDE3 and GNOME2


    where's the race? KDE appears to be ahead 3 to 2.

    I'm much more interested in seeing if RedHat (at 7.2) can catch Mandrake (up over 8 now)

  5. The true meaning of GNOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I think it is cool when people make up words that are made up of the first letters of other words.

  6. Re:GNOME, a thought by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 3, Funny
    Hee hee...

    X-Windows: ...A mistake carried out to perfection. X-Windows: ...Dissatisfaction guaranteed. X-Windows: ...Don't get frustrated without it. X-Windows: ...Even your dog won't like it. X-Windows: ...Flaky and built to stay that way. X-Windows: ...Complex nonsolutions to simple nonproblems. X-Windows: ...Flawed beyond belief. X-Windows: ...Form follows malfunction. X-Windows: ...Garbage at your fingertips. X-Windows: ...Ignorance is our most important resource. X-Windows: ...It could be worse, but it'll take time. X-Windows: ...It could happen to you. X-Windows: ...Japan's secret weapon. X-Windows: ...Let it get in *your* way. X-Windows: ...Live the nightmare. X-Windows: ...More than enough rope. X-Windows: ...Never had it, never will. X-Windows: ...No hardware is safe. X-Windows: ...Power tools for power fools. X-Windows: ...Putting new limits on productivity. X-Windows: ...Simplicity made complex. X-Windows: ...The cutting edge of obsolescence. X-Windows: ...The art of incompetence. X-Windows: ...The defacto substandard. X-Windows: ...The first fully modular software disaster. X-Windows: ...The joke that kills. X-Windows: ...The problem for your problem. X-Windows: ...There's got to be a better way. X-Windows: ...Warn your friends about it. X-Windows: ...You'd better sit down. X-Windows: ...You'll envy the dead.

    Copied from this page.
    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  7. My observation of why UNIX sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    UNIX is very simple, for an operating system, it's not complex at all. Plus no one has to see that stuff, it's always hidden behind shells.

    I think the major flaw with UNIX is not it's command line, complexity or speed, but the fact that it has no standard shell.

    While a lot of linux kids see the ability to use any shell (or even implement their own) as a good thing, I see it as a huge hindrance to usability. A user has to learn the different behaviours of bash, csh, ksh, tcsh and virtually countless others, all with their own prompts, line editors and ways of doing things. Aside from the "look" the "feel" of UNIX will always be discordant, further slowing the already confused or annoyed user down in a quagmire of quotes and pipes.

    IMO, if linux (or any UNIX aside from OSX) is going to have any chance at the desktop market, it either has to standardize and enforce a single shell, or be replaced by something more modern.

    No, wait! make that no standard text editor. I mean, no standard window manager. I mean, no standard programming language. I mean...

    Point is, you can standardize on a toolkit for X if you want to, but that doesn't mean everyone should.

    :wq