Who Has Faster Pipes? Linux, Win2000, WinXP Compared
SeaBait writes: "This revealing article about the High-performance programming techniques on Linux and Windows shows that Linux rules. The performance testing was on Pipes(interprocess communication mechanism available on both Windows and Linux and UNIX). Although I new Linux would fare the best, the poor performance of Windows XP was a surprise. Windows 2000 actually did better than XP!"
IBM's interest in LINUX is primarily on the S/390 platform, not an INTEL platform. Windows 2k/XP isn't available on the primary platform that IBM is touting LINUX for...
IBM has every bit as much to gain or lose as any other PC/Server manufacturer does in an 386 platform.
-- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
Who new? I gnu, how 'bout you?
- - - If the sun is a star, why can't I see it at night?
What does Xp stand for anyway? Apparently 'eXtremely Pokey' , or maybe even 'Ex-Purchaser.' :-)
Although I new Linux would fare the best
/. grammar class
Welcome to
He wasn't complaining about use of caps for those two, he was complaining about use of caps for "pipes".
Then why did he say this?
Also, while I'm willing to forgive the use of UNIX and COM in capitol letters
What was there to forgive? Those were correct. Sure, he goes on to say there was no reason to use caps for pipes, but nobody was disputing that.
Moron.
I think we all see the irony in that last remark now.
It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
MS Vs Linux.
You can use An Icon of Tux with boxing Gloves punching a Windows Logo.
In Soviet Russia, Trojan exploits YOU!
CColonBackSlashDot.org
Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.