Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

IBM Launches p690

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the things-to-blow-the-budget-on dept.

edyavno writes: "IBM just announced the launch of their new high-end Unix server p690. It's based on its new Power 4 chip, and is in the same category as just announced Sun's SunFire 15K. It also includes some mainframe level features and can be used either as a single large server or divided into up to 16 "virtual" servers, running any combination of AIX 5L and Linux. Here's yahoo article, and here it is from IBM itself."

4 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Sure, it LOOKS powerful... by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    [sarcasm]But if you'll take a look, neither Photoshop Filter or Final Cut Pro benchmarks are even obtainable... obviously it pales in comparison to a Dual G4-800![/sarcasm]

  2. My question has been answered! by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "achieves leadership in business, scientific and Java performance benchmarks"

    I had always been wondering what kind of system was needed to run Java apps at a decent speed.

  3. Re:Wrong Comparision by Tower · · Score: 5, Informative

    disclaimer: I'm an IBM employee (and have played with systems using the POWER4)

    First of all, let me mention that the RS/6k S80 (two releases ago - prior to the p680) outdid the 10k, at reduced cost, with the previous generation of procs. 16 processors outdid 64 in many, many tests (including ones with real-world data movement).

    As for partitioning... hmmm... let's think. IBM has been doing logical partitioning in AS/400 for a while, and on the S/390 (now the z-series) for quite some time... a few decades now. A lot of that experience went into this.

    Regarding the POWER4:
    Scalability: The eServer p690 is able to marshal up to 1,000 processors for high-performancesupercomputing duty, in applications such as Business Intelligence or seismic data interpretation. (think - the big supercomputers are right now POWER3, with several POWER4 systems in devel)

    Raw power:
    Our POWER4 processor can handle seventeen times more data than the UltraSparc III chip used in Sun's brand-new "Star Cat" top-of-the line F150000. Only 32 IBM processors outperform double the number of Ultra Sparcs - which draw much more power, create more heat and are less efficiently packaged than ours, which use modules developed for the eServer z900 mainframe. (The CPU numbers can be found in SPECmark, and from other benchmarks, including TPC-C, Javamarks, and some other fairly useless comparisons).

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  4. Re:SPEC numbers by King+Babar · · Score: 5, Funny
    SPECint2000 Base and SPECfp2000 Base are single-threaded applications and the results only tests one CPU. I'd like to see how well it scales in performance at 32 processors. That thing could be one very powerful Oracle database server or an application server.

    For what it's worth, the 32 processor 1.3GHz models claim an rPerf of 50.56, and all the number seem to scale about as you'd expect (e.g., not quite linear in # of processors).

    But, sicko that I am, where I think the Power4 might really get down and dirty is in supercomputing applications. None of this sharing, caring relational database stuff. No siree; I'm into a much more serious kind of scene. This freaky baby was just built for LINEAR ALGEBRA, friend, and I've heard that she can keep on doing it it all night long! We're talking a *serious* FLOPhouse here, folks. But you've got to talk dirty to it, something like Hey, take a look at this generalized eigenvalue problem--have you seen a longer or harder one than...

    Uh, excuse me; I guess I was losing my composure a bit back there. I've got both hands back on the keyboard now.

    But doesn't anybody else ever wonder why there aren't more LINPACK benchmarks posted on alt.sex.stories?

    --

    Babar