Slashdot Mirror


Wind River lays off FreeBSD developers; Q&A

SidVicious and Intosi both wrote in with news that Wind River Systems (WRS), who had acquired BSDi's software assets earlier this year, including a team of FreeBSD developers, has laid off those developers. This has also been reported in other places, such as DaemonNews. This raises some interesting questions; for example, what happens to the "FreeBSD" trademark, which Wind River currently own. Read on for Wind River's answers to this and other questions.

In the interests of full disclosure. I'm also nik@freebsd.org, although not a WRS employee. I was employed by BSDi in Europe, before the European team were laid off as part of the WRS acquisition. These questions were answered by WindRiver's PR department.

Q: WRS has already been through two rounds of layoffs in the recent past. Why this third set of lay offs now? Are the FreeBSD developers the only ones affected?

Wind River has only had two rounds of layoffs. During the second round Wind River decided to divest itself of the FreeBSD project. We spent several weeks looking for a suitable corporate sponsor but did not find any company with sufficient interest and financial capability in this challenging economy. This week's layoff of the FreeBSD employees is therefore Wind River's "final option" in executing the plans set in motion by the second round of layoffs.

Q: WRS currently own the trademark "FreeBSD". Do WRS plan to retain the trademark? If so, why? If not, will WRS let the trademark lapse? Or are there plans to transfer it to a third party, such as the FreeBSD Foundation?

Wind River plans to ensure continuation of the altruistic, open stewardship of the FreeBSD trademark. We feel strongly that the FreeBSD project must be protected and encouraged and that a FreeBSD trademark in the wrong hands could be very detrimental. We continue to search for the best solution. No specific third-party has yet been determined, but transfer to a suitable third-party is the leading option being considered.

Q: WRS own the "bsd.com" domain. Will that be retained?

Possibly. Wind River will continue to invest in BSD/OS and participate as a highly interested member of the *BSD community. As such, the bsd.com domain may be important for Wind River. We are weighing this against the needs of the *BSD community and hope to resolve the issue later this month.

Q: What's happening to the "FreeBSD Mall", at freebsdmall.com?

freebsdmall.com continues to operate and take orders, and all new and existing orders from customers for FreeBSD 4.4 or other products will continue to be fulfilled. Wind River is still evaluating its long term options and strategy for the FreeBSD Mall, but plans to maintain its presence and service either internally or externally.

Q: As part of the BSDi acquisition, WRS will (presumably) have picked up customers who had subscribed to the BSDi CD sets of FreeBSD. Will WRS continue to service those customers, or are their subscriptions now cancelled?

Like all customer contracts, subscription orders will continue to be fulfilled.

Q: BSDi (and, it seemed, WRS) had made some headway in producing additional FreeBSD boxed products to go in to the retail channel. Will WRS continue to do this?

Wind River is currently continuing activities to promote FreeBSD 4.4 through the retail channel. Future FreeBSD releases will probably not be produced or distributed by Wind River.

Q: Will WRS continue to produce the usual 4 disc CD sets of FreeBSD, including one for the recently released FreeBSD 4.4?

Yes, for FreeBSD 4.4.

Q: WRS had been funding work on the FreeBSD Handbook, in order to print the second edition in the near future. [ Disclaimer, I'm co-editor of this work, along with your employee, Murray Stokely ] Will WRS continue with plans to print the second edition of the FreeBSD Handbook?

Wind River will encourage any stewards that emerge to take on FreeBSD publication to complete and publish this work.

Q: WRS houses the "FreeBSD Test Lab" at its Alameda campus. Will WRS continue to host this facility?

No. Some equipment from this lab will be transferred to Yahoo! which hosts much of the build structure equipment for FreeBSD, as well as the primary CVS source repository and main FreeBSD mail server. Wind River does not plan to maintain the FreeBSD test lab at its Alameda, CA headquarters.

6 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. The bigger question... by The+Original+Bobski · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    What happens to "free" OS's when corporate greed^H^H^H^H^H financing (the so-called saviour) takes over? Corporations traditionally gut anything not making money - what's to become of the carcass?

    --
    satire, n: 1) witty language used to convey insults or scorn; 2) a form of humor lost on most slashdot moderators.
  2. Re:What happens after FreeBSD 4.4 then? by media.darling · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, according to the news, nothing. I'm assuming 5.x is mostly toast for now, 4.x is supported but not officially developed from now on. I'd hate to say that FreeBSD is dead, but (and this is as a FreeBSD user since 4.0) it appears that the appelation, at least, is dead. Locked up in the hands of WR and not going anywhere. Hopefully, something nice will happen and it will get bought by or transferred to someone of a wholesome and *BSD-tropic nature. Nice to see that BSD/OS is ostensibly going to continue, but what innovations have ever come OUT of BSD/OS? I have been under the impression that BSD/OS is the glue factory for our doddering developments over on the Free side of things.

    Anywhoo, WR is gone, long live King Hubbard!

    --
    What's tty3 and why won't my program exit when I push Alt-F4?
  3. What about APPLE!? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    suitable corporate sponsor but did not find any company with sufficient interest and financial capability in this challenging economy.

    Ummm Isnt Apple's OSX built on FreeBSD?

    Ahhh the trappings of the BSD license, you do the work - someone else makes money by stealing it.

  4. Re:Stability by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The GPL is a horrid concept to anyone who believes that their hard work is worth something.

  5. Re:Stability by aozilla · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Embedded developers, for example, can educate you on that one.

    You mean like Tivo?

    You obviously missed the KSE import by Julian Elischer and Peter Wemm. Futhermore, there has been an increase in people working on the CURRENT sourcecode.

    Oh well, have fun spending your time working on a useless operating, I guess.

    --
    ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  6. Re:Stability by aozilla · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Instead of forking and changing the license why not just contribute to one of the projects?

    I offered years ago. No one took me up on the offer. Tell me what you need done, and I'll gladly spend a few hours a week working on it. I'm not going to bust my ass begging people to let me help them, however.

    Oh wait, you would rather talk about it than fucking do any work.

    Yes, and frankly I believe that presenting people with reasons to stop wasting their time on a dying operating system is more productive than writing code for a dying operating system.

    --
    ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?