Ask the W3C's RAND Point Man
Danny Weitzner is Director of the World Wide Web Consortium's Technology and Society activities, which means he's in charge of handling reactions to a W3C proposal that would allow "Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory" (hence "RAND") license fees to be charged for use of W3C-endorsed standards that are covered by patents or other trade restrictions. Many prominent Free Software and Open Source people are firmly against RAND; RMS has even emailed me personally several times, asking me to post a link to this anti-RAND story (in which he is quoted). Slashdot has mentioned this controversy before, because we, too, feel it's important.. But Danny is the person at W3C who is dealing directly with all of this, so he's the person we should question. So ask away, one question per post as usual, and we'll post Danny's answers to 10 of the highest-moderated questions as soon as he gets them back to us.
The worst terrorist incident on the US soil took place on 11th September and you're writing about something as trivial as W3C-endorsed standards!?
What the fuck is your major malfunction numbnuts? Did your mommy not love you enough?
Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
I inherently fear the RAND proposals but will be for the rules if it allows me to overcome the lameness filter on Slashdot so that users may post ASCII art depicting acts of sodomy and penis-birds.
Any plans?
Anxiously awaiting your reply,
AC
"point man" is such a retarded metaphor. i picture a "point man" as being either a) the receiver of a gay rimjob, or b) the "winner" in a 6 man circle jerk