Slashdot Mirror


Intel Promises A Cool Billion (Transistors)

NevDull writes: "CNN is reporting that Intel has announced new semiconductor packaging which will lead to CPUs with a billion transistors running at 20GHz within 6 years. Yummy!" The advance here is removing the balls of solder between the chip's packaging and the microprocessor core, which leaves room for more transistors (or a thinner package). Like it says, though, this is years away from your pocket Cray.

2 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Do we actually NEED this much CPU power? by kzanol · · Score: 5, Insightful
    A Cool Billion

    If only it were so - but looking back on the development later new cpu generations I'd bet it's going to be a HOT billion...

    requirements for cooling of new cpus are becoming ever more demanding, just the cpu can burn in excess of 50W in existing cpus.

    So, for my own requirements I'm more interested in getting an (energy) efficient system that can run with as few fans and noise as possible - it's practically impossible nowerdays to get a box where CPU power is NOT sufficient for even the most demanding tasks. The downside is that most modern boxes seem to be best suited for running flight simulators - at least they sound like jet engines.

    Also if you're working in an office with a lot of computers, the heat output of computers and monitors can be VERY noticyble, esp. in summer. (No, there's no aircondition in my office).

    Hopefully the new technology will not only be used to reate overpowerd energy hogs but also find its way into (mobile?) processors - same cpu core as existing cpu, but smaller layout, lower core voltage and correspondlingly much cooler/more silent.

    --
    you have moved your mouse, please reboot to make this change take effect
  2. Moores Law by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    20GHz in 6 years? Sounds slow to me.

    current speeds are at 2G 2 X 2 = 4GHz in 18 months

    4 X 2 = 8GHz in 3 years. 8 X 2 = 16GHz and then 16 x 2 = 32GHz in 6 years. So why is IBM falling behind?