Napster Calls MusicNet Monopolistic; Judge Agrees
MattW writes "Yahoo is carrying an article from the AP about a development in ongoing Napster litigation. Several major labels and RealNetworks formed MusicNet. Napster complained about an anti-competitive clause in the contract they signed with MusicNet, and Marilyn Hall Patel, best known to this community for her stern condemnation of Napster, agreed, stating that MusicNet had all the hallmarks of an anticompetitive business. The article goes on to state that, "If the recording industry was found to have misused its copyrighted material, it might not be able to successfully pursue an infringement claim on those works.""
sometime in the future....
me: Man, I just can't get than new Madona song out of my head.
BMG-Warner-EMI-Borg: You owe use $2.11
-- www.globaltics.net
Political discussion for a new world
napster actually won a court battle?
Perfect case of Dog bites human. I hope Napster gets a good bite out of the recording labels. Pitt bull any one?
make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
You mean that ANTI-TRUST law applies to the music industry??? Howdidd 'at happen? Have to get that outrage corrected right away - "Senator Hollings!".
sPh
Pot calling the kettle black..
.com vs established monopoly.
no, napster was never in control.
Horse of a different color?
No,
Shoe's on the other foot?
Kinda.
The shoe's on the horse's other foot for calling the kettle black?
Yeah, uh-huh.
Remember kids, only you can prevent metafires.
score: +1 interesting, +1 funny +3 dumbass.
{laff...snort}
Moose.
Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
Is that "Napstar Lives" will join "Amiga Lives" as a commonly occuring topic on Slashdot...perhaps new ghost icons should be chosen from these back from the dead-like stories....
Du bist ein Moron.