Nurturing Ideas Into Open Source Projects?

lkehresman asks: "Over the course of the past few years, I have been involved in numerous open source projects and have been discovering the wonderful oddities with this development model. However, I am perplexed as to how one would go about starting a project with the bazaar model, and if it's even possible. Indeed, ESR states, "One can test, debug and improve in bazaar style, but it would be very hard to originate a project in the bazaar mode." Is this true? Can anyone give any personal testimony to projects that have succeeded being built like this from the ground up?"

"Until recently, I was the leader of the SquirrelMail project. When it started, we released version 0.1 and people started hacking on it. However, when we decided to do a rewrite, we attempted to start over using the bazaar model from the ground up, allowing for group discussions and decisions. We got caught in a years worth of discussion before any code was actually developed (now, however, its development is well under way and flourishing). I've seen this through personal experiece with countless other projects as well.

As I am venturing into this territory once again with a new project, I'm wondering if anyone in the community has had personal experience with this, and can lend advice as to how to avoid endless bickering about trivial issues. Having a code base to release is obviously a key factor, but in this case, that simply isn't possible due to the magnitude of the task at hand. Advice?"

Comments

Data Point

[FFFish]

Example of open-source idea that hasn't taken off: the endless work that has been done to create an workflow/information management system.

There have been at least a half-dozen attempts to plan such a system, but AFAIK none have made it to the point of being well-documented, let alone well-coded.

This is a shame, because its one of those "killer apps" that could rocket Linux into mainstream business use.