Tech Heavyweights and the SSSCA

Keith Russell writes: "Looks like Sen. Hollings' uphill climb just got a little bit steeper. The Computer Systems Policy Project, a trade group which includes IBM, Microsoft, Intel, Compaq, Dell, and Motorola, has officially stated their opposition to the SSSCA, calling it "an unwarranted intrusion by the government." The ZDNet article also indicates that Big Media isn't quite behind it themselves. Disney's support is well-documented, and Fox seems to like it, but AOL Time Warner and the MPAA, while keen to the idea, don't like this bill in particular." Read the entire article - not supporting this proposal "in its current form" is not very strong opposition.

Comments

frist ps0t

[Anonymous Coward]

diego serna diego serna diego seeeeeeeeeerna maricon!

No... can't believe that !

[Anonymous Coward]

Pirst Fost !!!!

Here's an idea!

[Anonymous Coward]

I have lots of money that I want to give away. So
I came up with an idea. For each troll posted today (except for goatse.cx trolls),
I will contribute 5 cents to the Sept 11 fund. If
you come up with a new original troll, I will contribute one
dollar. I like trolls so I would like to see everybody
here send me to the poor house. So get your new trolls
made and start trolling!

Re:Ft

[Clint Trollwood]

I'll probably get moded down for this but...

propz to all dead fart warriors and my baby's momma.

Troll Tuesday

War Bonds? What War? @# +1 ; Intriguing #@

[Anonymous Coward]

From CNN:

War Bonds Near Approval in Congress

The first U.S. war bonds since World War II are
nearing approval in Congress, although many analysts say the idea is useful more as a public morale booster than as a significant help to the anti-terror effort.

"From a financial standpoint, it's meaningless. People can buy savings bonds now,"
said Henry Aaron, senior economist at the Brookings Institution think tank. "It may
be, from a psychological standpoint, a small effect."

Even the Treasury Department is giving the bonds idea a lukewarm response, although officials are careful to praise the "patriotic intent and sentiment" of the legislation's sponsors on Capitol Hill.

Re:More government intervention

[Pig Hogger]

Similar example: Democrats don't want government intrusion in abortion and reproductive rights, but they are fine with government dictating what parents teach their kids. They oppose government road blocks that search for illegal drugs, they support mandated smog testing

Illegal drug use only affects the user. Smog-causing automobiles affects everybody.

With the republicans, the need of the few outweight the need of the many. Not so with the democrats.

bin Laden in ... S. America??

[wytcld]

The administration is collecting evidence of al Qaeda operatives involved in cocaine trafficking in Paraguay and Colombia. Islamic fundamentalist cells are operating in a tri-border area of Paraguay, Argentina and Brazil. Evidence has been found of al Qaeda members in this no man's land, a senior administration official says.

So, either the war on drugs is creating the economic environment that supports al Qaeda, or else this claim by a "senior official" is BS intended to excuse military action in S. America. Why does it seem incredible to me that S. American coke runners would welcome or benefit from partnership with Moslem religious/political extremists? Yes, they do business with local Marxist insurgencies, but that's because those have a political base there. Like, Columbians need help money laundering or running drugs? And we're supposed to be prepared for this war not to end in "our lifetime"?

I'm prepared to stand behind America doing some really ugly things to those who have actually attacked us. Doing ugly things to those who provide consumer society with its vices I'm only for it also broadens to include the idiots who sold us the SUVs that make us oil-addicted clients of the Saudi princes who have financed bin Lauden all along.