Slashdot Mirror


Holographic Sonar Cryptography

Atomic Snarl writes: "New Scientist.com has this story on how to encrypt a underwater sonar message using multiple sound path timing. By detecting and adapting for the current variations on underwater sound channels, the transmitted message can be received intelligibly only at a single point. This holographic approach suggests a method of web encryption using multiple hop paths and ping times to create a message which can only be decoded when received at a specific target node!"

3 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Doubt that it would be useful.. by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its been done. Read `the cuckoos egg` by clifford stoll. They worked out the hacker was in Germany via a similar method to the one you described.

  2. It won't work for the Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You can't emulate wave interference on the net (soon to be .NET). With sound or light you can use wave interference to either cancel or amplify a wave form depending on the frequency, distance, and position. The sonar technology is nothing new. The same approach has already been applied to Light, and the NSA has already investigated using this technology for secure satilite transmissions, and the DoD is rumored to be using this technology for secure land-line connections.

    However, You can not use wave interference on the net because the information is received as a digital signal. The communication devices have no control over the way the data is encoded on a fiber or copper connection, so its impossible to implement this technology for net traffic. At best if you have control access at both end and you create custom hardware between two points you could use this to encode traffic.

  3. Re:Radio? by jlseagull · · Score: 2, Informative

    i've done some work on this. this is indeed possible, though the radios on both ends need high sample rates if the communication will be recieved over short distances, which isn't practical on 802.11b cards - the sample rates are in the Gs/s range. in addition, the signal environment that 802.11b operates in is highly variable, and subject to reflective and refractive variations in power on the order of +/-3dB over 10us. Phase variations can be as large as 1000%(that is, 10 times as long as the wave itself) over the same timescale, making phase correlation and interferometrics totally useless. Something as simple as a fan running can perturb the signal environment on the other side of the building to this degree(believe me, we tried it). it might, *might* work over larger static environments like a city or a mountain range, but 802.11b isn't spec'd for that kind of range. so the short answer is, no.

    --
    'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki