Do Digital Photos Endanger History?
Ant writes "Experienced photographer Jayne West wrote her degree dissertation on the
historical impact of digital capture. She
argues that the use of digital photography in
news reporting means we could lose a
valuable pictorial record of history." Much of her argument seems weak to me (precisely because digital photography allows the instant culling West talks about). The digital storage itself, though, perhaps ought to make us nervous.
Mankind has existed for a couple of million years. The camera has existed for 150 years. Color prints made in the the last fifty years are fading away. Nasa has lost digital data from there early probes.
We don't seem to be learning from the history we know about now. Maybe we should just let history fade away to tall tales like those hunters did a million years ago.
Nothing lasts in the end.
Hey! Do you know how many shots you can get out of the battery with that setup if the LCD is turned off. I want to buy a G2/1Gig for a camp/canoe trip in several months.
Veganism may be defined as a way of living which seeks to exclude, as far as possible and practical, all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose.
"As far as possible and practical". Anti-Vegans love to bait Vegans by looking far enough "down the line" to find some fault in their behaviour, but this is not a productive mode of criticism. After all, at least they're trying.
Freedom: "I won't!"