Peer-to-Peer for Academia
Andy Oram has a good speech online about peer-to-peer and universities. He discusses a variety of possible research topics under the p2p umbrella and urges university administrators to promote this instead of squashing it.
Anyone know the status of this amendment? Did it get tacked onto the bill that passed a few days ago?
Peer-to-peer, like many other technologies, has it's advantages and disadvantages. For some purposes (not just file-swapping), it's absolutely ideal (OK, OK so I'm a fan of SETI@Home :) ).
:) As I was taking my mandatory networking classes (which I wish I had paid more attention during), we discussed p2p quite a bit. By my senior year (Waaaaay back in...'98 :) ) there had already been several groups of students who created p2p final projects.
I just find it rather surprising that academia has taken this long to embrace p2p. It's not as if p2p has been an unknown or undiscussed topic in the realm of computer science. When I was in college, it seemed that the university was eager to stress the importance of object-oriented programming and relational databases...well, as soon as the market stressed their importance.
Is the market the core of the issue? Do colleges only adapt to teaching new technologies quickly when the market demands it? If that's the case, it would seem like more CS degress would be the equivalent of training at a vocational/technical school.
My sigs always suck.
I have often thought of P2P as being similiar to neural networks or the brain. Nodes that are structurally similiar and carry info to and fro.
Do our brains have bandwidth issues? No, because supposedly we only use 10%. Gnutella is always ridiculed because of it's overhead though. But Napster and the rest don't really count though because they are centralized, so how does our brain not get overwhelmed and how can this be applied to P2P.
"I'm not surprised that colleges would complain about Napster bandwidth requirements because I hear the same wringing of hands over education in general. I hear there are too many applicants to top colleges. Excuse me, but wouldn't it be good to educate more students? Instead of saying there are too many applicants, why don't you work on increasing the availability of high-quality course offerings? I know you don't have tenure-track positions for all the people awarded doctorates, but it's not your job to offer everyone a position; it's your job to educate them."
Excellent point.
First off, academic bandwidth should be used for academic purposes. Sure, limited personal use is fine but its main purpose isn't entertainment. That being said, I know my university doesn't care if you run SETI@Home but do care when you run Kazzaa or other file sharing software. I think that's a good stand by the administrators. My university doesn't force anyone to use their network services. (They actually encourage you to get @Home.) If you want to use P2P software, get @Home or DSL and do whatever you want.
I'm not sure in the States, but in Canada Universities have very small budgets that are being cut yearly. I'd rather the University had a decent network and focus spending on research rather than worry about supporting P2P stuff.
As much as I agree that universities should keep their networks open, I have to disagree with this point. Why? Because initial "gray" work can (and probably should) still be done on an isolated network. Not only does it make sure that projects don't accidently kill the campus or departmental network, it also makes debugging a heck of a lot easier. And, once the prototypical work is done, you can usually convince some professor to beat IT into submission for you. Most departments have a couple of spare boxes lying about (heck, back at my school twenty years ago, there were usually anywhere from 2-3 midicomputers lying about totally unutilized at any time). Hubs are cheap. Linux makes a relatively stable development platform for gray work. So, in the end, I don't see "sealed tight" campus networks as a huge impediment to self-motivated research (unless it's cultural research into the latest works of Limp Bizkit).
That is all.
P2P is more than swapping files efficiently, sweating about copyright and bashing the RIAA. at P2PQ for example they are doing somehting that uses P2P but which is unrelated to filesharing. This is a perfect example of P2P put to a pure academic purpose. If all the people holed up in dorms in colleges around the country used it as much as they use file swapping P2P, we would not hear so much of the tired arguments against P2P being trottedd around whenever those three characters are strung together.