Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Pixar Finally Offers Animated Shorts on Pixar.com

Posted by chrisd on from the chess-or-self-hatred dept.

NicerGuy writes "Today I was bored and decided to check out pixar.com. I hadn't been there in a long time, but was pleasantly surprised to find that they have finally made all(?) of their animated shorts available for download. The films, which are in QuickTime format, include my favorites: Geri's Game and Luxo Jr."

3 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Ooh, so confusing by squaretorus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    indeed!
    This is why little companies should STAY little companies, or be broken out into little companies if they were originally part of a big company.

    The whole movie industry stinks - but their products, occassionally, don't.

    Pixar=Disney=Cant give them money.

    BUT - the last 5 seconds of the monsters inc trailer is the funniest thing I've seen in YEARS - no... wait... EVER!

    Whats a guy to do?? I dunno - Im going to have to either wait for it to be on free to air TV or sneak into the movies for the first time since I was 13.

  2. Quicktime. Great.... by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The question I have is, are these Quicktime using a codec that non-Mac, non-Windows folks can view?

    Also, the big argument about Quicktime is "Higher quality, lower bitrate". Does this hold true against MPEG4? DiVX ;)?

    If Pixar is USING Linux internally, why don't they support it more EXTERNALLY?

    And the last question: how does Pixar convert from whatever format they use internally to QuickTime? Are any of these conversion tools available for Linux?

    --
    www.eFax.com are spammers
    1. Re:Quicktime. Great.... by forgoil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Higher quality? Give me a break...

      We are not talking about just any source here, we are talking about very high quality rendered animations. It's beyond me how they can release these in anything but the higest possible quality (anything less than DVD quality is a shame).

      Small crappy video might be nifty for modems and not that terribly gr8 sources, but in this case I would argue that the highest possible quality (that everyone can watch) should be the goal. I rather have them put these on their DVDs (which reminds me that I need to buy more of those) than in low quality