Are There Large RDBMS Using Linux?
Jason Perlow of Linux Magazine writes:"
With all of the recent computer press coverage of Amazon and Intel converting their
web servers and other front end application servers to Linux, many of these stories
neglect to mention that the back end systems these companies use still rely on
commercial Unixes like Solaris, AIX and HPUX to host their RDBMSes (Oracle, DB2,
Sybase, Informix) for their mission critical transactional applications and data
mining.
Are there any companies out there actively using Linux to host a mission-critical
RDBMS ? or looking to replace UNIX with Linux for this purpose?"
Kill roommate! I really think the world would be a better place if all drunks died.
Uh, hello... Slashdot uses Linux for it's mission-critical databases!
Never ever had any downtime, I don't believe. Fast AND Reliable: Linux.
Why the fuck should there be a difference between the database backend and the Webserver frontend in this regard?
The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
--Henry Kissinger
Oh, that's meaningful. Looking for how many Linux users have Logitech mice hooked up should shed just as much insight into this question.
- Sig this!
Uhh, when a Linux user talks about a very large database... He's thinking about the 40 Gig drive in his desktop computer and going...
"Man, wouldn't it be bitching to make a Beowulf cluster out of these?"
But do the citizens of Bloomington know their city is using Marxist software (GNU)?
What legitimate member of the /. community uses a phrase like "mission critical transactional applications and data mining?" This posting reads like a really, really bad press release.
Where?? "Are There
Technically, this is incorrect grammar.
That seems pretty darned serious to me. Any Tucows employees care to comment?
-AC
We tried that, unfortunately Linux kept crashing under high load and just wouldn't scale. We switched back to Sun and things have been smooth ever since. I guess you get what you pay for, huh?