Slashdot Mirror


CrossOver Plugin 1.0 Demo Version

jwnewman writes "CodeWeavers has released the Demo version of CrossOver plugin." I bought the regular version when it first came out, just to try it out. It's pretty impressive - I've only had some problems with it under Konqueror, but that's had more to do with my plugin setup. The demo version is a full version, but with nags in it. It's well worth checking out.

7 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. Reasonably priced.. by A+Commentor · · Score: 3, Interesting
    At $19.95, it seems reasonably priced, but it adds up since I have several Linux Boxes at home...

    Maybe they should have some 'home' (non-business) site license for about $25 ;-)

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

  2. Missing the point by matty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The three posters above me have completely missed shanek's point, namely that these plugins are available for free on Windows and Mac. He's simply saying that it's too bad that we don't have the same free (beer) access to these plugins that Windows and Mac users have.

    While it's true that he's getting his OS for free, what about those who buy Red Hat or Mandrake or whatever? Why should they have to pay for something that Windows and Mac users get free? That's his question really.

    I intend to try it, and I'll pay for it myself if it works, though. I use Debian and therefore never have to pay for my OS. :)

  3. This "could" have been real progress for switching by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If only these would have been released under some opensource license. These plugins could have been implemented in the next version of SuSE/Redhat/Debian/name your dist. and would have really bridged a gap for getting windows users comfortable with using linux on the desktop.

    Oh well, it's still cool news.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  4. Re:This "could" have been real progress for switch by Lathi- · · Score: 2, Interesting
    These plugins could have been implemented in the next version of SuSE/Redhat/Debian/name your dist.

    Save for debian, there's nothing that prevents SuSE/RedHat/Mandrake/etc. from bundling this with their "Official" distributions. I'm betting the guys over at Codeweaver would negotiate some kind of bundling price.
  5. I tried it, its well worth it by Christianfreak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Installed flawlessly, nice configurator, it looks nice and best of all IT WORKS. I was skeptical at first but then I got to see the Star Wars trailer. I'm going to shell out the $20 for it. Try it out you might be as surprised as I was.

    On a side note they don't disable the demo after 30 days. It looks like its more of an on your honor system. But it does put little messages to buy the software at the beginning of the movies. (At least in quicktime).

    Again though, this looks like it was well worth it and the $20 goes to Wine.

  6. I don't know about the business model, but... by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They have an interesting coming soon product. I'm referring to the second item, basically a simple client workstation built just to run Windows apps, but without purchasing Windows. I don't think this'll take off for internet appliances (might as well make a special Linux distro for that with custom apps), but it may open some eyes to other possiblities. Maybe distros built specifically to replace MS licenses. Maybe transitional product lines for moving MS users to free-as-in-speech platforms. I think making that transitional product is a great idea, and of course charging for it is logical and potentially very profitable in the long run.

    Having transitional products is the best way to show corporations how much money they can save from MS licenses, while getting them onto free software. This is very and sounds like a great business model (at least for this specific product).

  7. Re:I probably won't use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    > As for Quicktime, complain to the web site using it and ask them to use an open format instead (in fact, do that whether or not you actually have a Quicktime viewer).

    A format such as Ogg may be open, but until it gets significant support on Windows, it's also considered useless by website operators. They want the maximum eyes possible, not to be openly correct.

    Now, if you could just get a good movement to getting Ogg supported in Windows Media Player or the Real Player, now we'd be talking.

    Oooops, darn - that's not gonna happen anytime soon, is it?..