Slashdot Mirror


Borland Releases Kylix 2

Tal Cohen writes "Borland Kylix 2 is now available. Most new features are geared at Enterprise-level developers; the Open edition is still available for free download. The CLX (cross-platform component library) is covered under both GNU and Borland's license." The new features list is interesting - a fair number of buzzwords, but it also looks like they are supporting a lot of the new stuff. The white papers have some interesting topics - including gcc vs. Kylix.

5 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. e-buzz word whip lash... by killthiskid · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just read the "what's new" page and I got e-buzz word whip lash...


    They should put up some damn warnings or something.


    i.e. : Build Web Services-enabled database middleware with DataSnap(TM) that scales and interoperates with your complete e-business solution...


    Ok, now a serious question... is ANYONE out there using this? I've read the reviews, I read some tutorials, and my interest is sparked, but I want to here some testimony.

    1. Re:e-buzz word whip lash... by O2n · · Score: 4, Funny

      That phrase alone is "bingo" for everybody in the audience...

  2. borland has released Kylix by donabal · · Score: 2, Funny

    yea. i hear about this EVERY TIME I START UP BORLAND C++BUILDER. [since last year...]

    man... if only i cared.

    --donabal

    --
    Safety First Day?
  3. Re:Maybe too late by bitflip · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't like it. When am I supposed to take a smoke break?

  4. Object Pascal Rules! by jackjumper · · Score: 2, Funny

    *that* ought to get some people to comment.

    We've been using Delphi since version 1, and our flagship software (which controls a semiconductor manufacturing tool) is about 200,000 lines of Delphi 5 code. It takes about 30 seconds to compile.

    We also do C++ development, with CBuilder. Our largest C++ program, about 30,000 lines, takes 10 minutes.

    We've found that our object pascal code is more reliable, maintainable, and understandable than the C++ code we've developed. Even the most diehard c++-heads in our group admit that there is really no technical reason to prefer C++. The only reason they give is that it "looks better on our resume" (to that argument I reply we should be using Java).