Slashdot Mirror


Drive-By Hacking in London

delibes writes "The BBC News website carries this story about hacking wireless networks in London's financial centre. " There isn't really much in the way of details, just saying that many businesses don't encrypt their networks. They talk about finding 12 networks while driving 1km... 8 of which had no encryption.

2 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. Fluff by Apotsy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What a stupid article.

    It's hardly a secret that your laptop will see something when you're standing out in the parking lot near any company with an 802.11 network. That doesn't mean it's insecure. A company with even a smidgen of security sense will put the wireless network outside their firewall, and require employees to use VPN to access internal stuff. People on the outside may be able to get a little free internet access, but that's it.

    The article is very light on details, gives no information as to what "wide open" means (just because you can see the network, that does not mean it is insecure). There is only one mention of the word "firewall" in the whole thing, and even then it's very vague.

    I think this reporter has been duped by a couple of script kiddies. The supposed terms "war driving", "war pedalling", and "war walking" sound like something the kiddies made up on the spot, and later snickered at the reporter for believing.

  2. Read the article by strags · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll concede it's a little light on the technical details, but don't forget that this article is targetted at Joe Public.

    I think you missed the most revealing fact in the article: 8 out of 12 networks detected were not even using 802.11 encryption at all. Yes, we all know that 802.11 encryption is not secure, but the fact that people are broadcasting unencrypted packets does mean that the networks are incredibly insecure. I'm thinking of SMB, POP3, TELNET, FTP, or any other number of services that transmit either plaintext or weakly encrypted passwords.

    Yes, people should use VPNs, but the point of the article was that they're not.

    Also, "war driving" and "war pedalling" are actual, legitimate terms - I've seen them used on many occasions before, as would you, had you researched this at all before spouting off.