Is Storage Capacity Outstriping Backup Capability?

Kzip asks: "On my modest home LAN we have four computers with around 300Gb of storage. A lot of this is used, but not a lot of it is backed up (certainly not on a regular basis). When I started looking for a backup solution I found that most of the affordable tape backup was way to small (DAT 12/24 is just too small now a days) or too slow (Onstream do 50Gb but on IDE it's only ~1MB/s ... so 6 tapes over 80+ hours!) or just too expensive (HP Ultrium is great, but at £3000 for a drive and £120 per tape it's a little pricey). So I'd like to ask the /. community: Does anyone know of a fast and affordable backup system for home/small office use." After a quick scan of Pricewatch and other sites, it seems that backup solutions >99G are expensive (all the ones I could find were more than $1000US). How long will it be before these and terabyte-backup solutions become affordable for SOHO ^? use?

Comments

big backup costs big $$$

[green pizza]

At my university, our college of engineering bought a StorageTek Powderhorn for interdepartmental backup. The model we have currently has 100 TB of storage capacity and can be expanded to 300 TB. Its host is a massive Sun server connected to the core network switch via two gigE links and and one ATM link. At the server level in various departments and groups we are mostly doing RAID as disks have become so darn cheap. A simple script dumps data onto the Powderhorn across the street once a week in the event of a major malfunction (RAID recoveries don't always go smoothly), theft, or fire.