Slashdot Mirror


Government to Eavesdrop on Lawyer-Client Conversations

An Anonymous Coward writes: "This CNN article outlines the justice department's plans to start monitoring lawyer-client communications of detainees. The decision was made by the justice department without any public debate or the involvement of the Senate or Congress. It's astonishing how easily a basic civil right such as the right to counsel is taken away!" The ACLU is, predictably, opposed.

9 of 508 comments (clear)

  1. Time to turn that flag icon by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny

    upside down.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  2. DOJ Theme song by Hostile17 · · Score: 5, Funny

    99 civil rights on the wall, 99 civil rights, take on down, throw it away, 98 civil rights on the wall ....

    --
    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power - Benito Mussoli
    1. Re:DOJ Theme song by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > 99 civil rights on the wall, 99 civil rights, take on down, throw it away, 98 civil rights on the wall ....

      Close, but no cigar.

      "5 amendments scratched offa the paper, five amendments scratched off..."

      Look in the bright side - they have to stop before amendment 16!

  3. When will the time come? by IamLarryboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    When will things have gone far enough to justify a revolution? We are taliking about basic rights and freedoms here! These are rights and freedoms that PEOPLE DIED FOR!!!!Earlier today there was an anouncement on slashdot that now even math can be patented. Governmnet and corperations can now TELL US WHAT WE CAN DO WITH OUR OWN THOUGHTS AND IDEAS!!!Now we will be loosing our right to laywer clien confidentiality! This is argualby one of the most basic rights that we have! so when will the relolution come? how much longer can this go on? I say that a revolution would be moraly acceptable now. I do not think that that would be the most likely way to achieve the goal of getting our freedoms back. Nor do I think it would be the best way. I do however think that RIGHT NOW a revolution would be acceptable. That is scarry! If and when the revolution comes I suggest that the DOJ is the first against the wall. Then the Republicans. Then The Democrats. Then Microsoft! Wohoo! Just what I think.

  4. Re:is that really... by actappan · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's gonna be a firewall huh? How much you wanna bet they'de want it to run windows. :)

    --
    \Drew National Data Director, John Edwards for President
  5. Confuse the public, then take their rights away by Nitroshock · · Score: 4, Funny

    That move...is necessary to help "prevent further terrorist acts,"

    The article goes on to state

    The Justice Department said less than one-tenth of 1 percent of federal inmates are subject to the provision that allows such monitoring. It pointed out most inmates subject to special administrative measure have no relation to the terrorism investigation, spawned by the deadly September 11 hijackings and attacks.

    That prevents further terrorist acts, how? By monitoring non-terrorists? I'm gonna go prevent terrorism by washing my car.

  6. Re:Welcome to the Police State by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, you're just paranoid, when are you going to learn to trust President Ashcroft?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  7. Re:Welcome to the Police State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, you're just paranoid, when are you going to learn to trust President Ashcroft?

    President Cheney wants to have a word with you!

  8. Re:Welcome to the Police State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    You mean (Big) Brother Ashcroft don't you?