Slashdot Mirror


SourceForge Drifting

Zocalo sent us a story running at FSF Europe talking about SourceForge's Drifting. Talks about the fact that they are releasing a closed-source version of the code commercially and various copyright related things. Obviously VA owns both SF and Slashdot so I'm skewed, but my personal opinion is that VA is doing what they need to do to make a buck while still providing the SourceForge.net website to the Open Source community. And I think their decision to sell a closed-source proprietary version of the code would be hypocritical, except that they aren't a 100% open-source company any more. And *that* is the part that makes me the most sad.

3 of 382 comments (clear)

  1. Misinformation Correction by Hemos · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would like to point out that despite what's said in the drifting piece - Sourceforge.net does run on Free software. Sourceforge 3.0 Enterprise Edition has non-free components to it, the major part being the access into Oracle.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  2. Re:Just fork it! by big.ears · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unless the FSF is going to fund an open alternative to Source Forge they should get off their high horse.

    As stated in the article, Savannah is such an alternative supported by thy FSF.

  3. From the Site Director of SourceForge.net by PMcGovern · · Score: 5, Informative

    My name is Patrick McGovern and I manage SourceForge.net. I wanted
    to take a moment to address the issues that Loic raised in his
    recent article.

    As a background: SourceForge.net is a website within the
    Open Source Developers Network (OSDN), owned by VA Linux Systems.
    SourceForge.net provides free hosting for Open Source software
    development projects via its web site at http://sourceforge.net
    and http://sf.net

    SourceForge.net, OSDN and VA Linux systems are committed to the
    Open Source community. Two years ago (almost to the day)
    SourceForge.net was started to provide a way for Open Source
    developers to collaborate with each other and make great software.
    This mission has not changed. Today VA spends a tremendous amount
    of money and resources to provide excellent service to 30,000 projects.

    Loic brings up a number of points that are simply not accurate.

    * SourceForge (not SourceForge.net) is a collaborative software
    development platform. The SourceForge software originated as the
    foundation of the SourceForge.net service, and is now the basis of
    a number of products offered by VA Linux Systems. SourceForge
    Enterprise Edition is the commercial product released by
    VA Linux Systems last week. SourceForge is a software platform.

    * SourceForge.net is a service provided freely to Open Source
    software development projects. SourceForge.net is not running
    the SourceForge Enterprise Edition software. SourceForge.net is
    a web site, which provides a service to the Open Source community.

    * SourceForge.net provides free hosting for Open Source Software
    development projects. SourceForge.net is not now, or nor has it
    ever been, exclusive to free software -- we accept hosting requests
    from projects licensed under any OSI-approved Open Source License,
    and projects whose licenses have not been directly approved,
    but comply with the OSI Open Source Definition.

    * Data Export: The ability to export data from SourceForge.net
    has not changed. There is no conspiracy to 'lock projects in'
    to SourceForge.net. Every project has the ability to download
    a nightly tarball of their CVS code. If people have any concerns
    about their code, we recommend they set up a cron job to download
    the latest version. Eight months ago we did have a XML API that
    allowed project admins to download bug report data. The API broke
    earlier in the year when we enhanced the SF.NET code (version 2.5)
    to include the tracker (a tool that unifies all 'ticket-related'
    systems). Until recently, we didn't receive a lot of interest from
    the community to re-introduce the feature... so we have been focusing
    on other aspects of the site. We are now re-examining the issue.
    In the mean time, there are third-party programs which will collect
    the content directly from the site and extract that data.

    * Mailing Lists: One area we concentrating on, which Loic alludes to,
    is mailing list archives. This, historically, has been one of the
    weakest areas of SourceForge.net. We are currently working on a new
    solution, which directly integrates the mailing lists with
    SourceForge.net, as opposed to Geocrawler. We have just entered the
    initial beta phase for this project. It is still being worked on,
    but you can see it here in action:
    http://sourceforge.net/forum/?group_id=27464 (look at the last
    four forums). We are essentially using the SourceForge Forum code;
    the same code base that has been available to the community for
    some time.

    --

    Developers are choosing SourceForge.net because of the excellent
    resources and service we give the community. The site is currently
    growing at over 60 new projects and 700 developers a day. We just
    added new personnel and purchased 70 new servers to make sure we
    retain our excellent quality of service. We have added new download
    servers to make sure the community can get Source code as fast
    as possible. We have been adding additional hardware to
    the compile farm. (OS X systems were added last month).

    Finally, SourceForge.net is a free service. It's a service I believe
    greatly enhances the Open Source Developer's ability to write and
    release great software; and have it seen by a lot of people. If you
    feel that SourceForge.net is not for you, that is okay too. There are
    alternatives out there, and it's better to host your code where you
    think you will be the most productive.

    If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to write me:
    pat at sourceforge.net

    Thank you,

    Pat-

    Patrick McGovern
    email: Pat at SourceForge.net
    Director, SourceForge.net