Slashdot Mirror
Student Researcher Wins Patent Dispute
Matthew writes: "For years, student researchers at universities have alleged that the hierarchical system in academic research allows supervising PhDs to steal and patent inventions that were rightfully discovered by students. The Federal Circuit finally addressed these concerns by interpreting the law in a way that strictly protects the rights of student researchers. As such, student researchers will now be able to sue their supervising PhDs for any actions that are not in the best interests of the student researcher or the patent rights of the student researcher."
...their students inventions, they will not be motivated to have students to advice in the first place, and all innovation of the world, and civilization as we know it, will end.
</sarcasm>
Actual quote from a (weirdo) guy near N. C. State University:
"People don't invent things. People pay college students to invent things."
We ran into this guy at a chinese restaurant, where he was discussing his scheme to get a biochemistry major to develop implants for Marilyn Monroe (??)...
He said that he'd have gone to UNC-CH (just around the corner), but there are too many, you know, actual doctors there, who'd have asked too many questions...
There are plenty of weird people floating around colleges...
Patent law needs immediate reform.
The money and patent mongers play in
the equivalent of attack helliocoptors
and the students and engineers are like
the Afghans on the ground.
We don't stand a chance.
As a student one should focus on one's
subject. Instead students are forced to
learn arbitrary patent law.
Patents should never be inforced to
prevent others from using them unless
the others refuse to pay resonable fees.
In any case useful ideas should always be
used regardless of Calvanistic fantasys of
ownership. Yes, the ruling class of bankers
and lawyers has done some things well.
But in the case of patent law we see
extreame greed. The policy that is
foisted upon the rest of us by this power elite
is short sighted and does not promote
the free development of ideas.
Thus is it technically unconstitutional?
I must reread the constitutions statements
about patent law because I think the right
to do this was allowed for a reason.
Does current patent law violate the
constitutions reason for allowing it?
We need a revolution in thought concerning
patent law. We need honent people without
money mongering interests to come up with this.
But who?
"Congratulations, Mr. Jones, on your court victory. You now own the rights to the patent. Oh, by the way, here is the bill for all of your research time.
"What? You want us to give you a free ride because you're student? Ah, but you see, you've imbalanced our entire relationship: You agree to enter into slave labor for us for several years, and in return, we get to keep the credit for anything you do.
"But since you want to take this patent developed while using our equipment, and our labs, it only stands to reason that you're prepared to pay for it.
"Let's see... you've got this judgement, and we'll subtract lab fees, utilities, maintenance (gotta pay the janitors to empty out the bit bucket)... hmmm... tell you what, just give us another $85,000 and we'll call it even.
"You mean you can't afford that? Well, surely we can work something out. If you'd be willing to work here a couple of years, I bet -- Put down the laptop Mr. Jones, you're scaring me a little..."
"You're never ready, just less unprepared."
I was developing a 5 MW laser and my professor stole it to put onto a B-1 bomber. I had the last laugh though! I filled a huge aluminum foil bag with popcorn kernels and hacked the targetting system of the laser so that when it the laser was fired, it hit the popcorn kernels and filled my professors whole house with popcorn!
Well ... let's hear you pronounce "Rødgrød med fløde". When you can do that, and construct a meaningfull correct two line sentence in danish - then we can talk :-)
:-) )
Until then, please settle with correcting my spelling and gramatical errors, and drop the snide remarks. They only costs karma (as will this post
We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
Hey, I'm only the programmer...
Dam right! It was probably the test / QA department that found all the bugs, and made you fix them, that made the customer impressed with the system.
But hey, they're only testers!