Securing DNS From The Roots Up
jeffy124 writes: "This article at ComputerWorld tells the story of how ICANN would like to replace the root DNS systems with secured servers. Lars-Johan Liman, one of the root operators, spoke about the concept at ICANN's annual meeting today. He discussed how the world's current redundant DNS system is vulnerable to DDOS attacks and yet-to-be-discovered root holes in bind that can ultimately undermine the entire Internet by taking away the name-IP mappings that are relied upon by just about everyone."
Bind may be vulnerable to security exploits! Sendmail may *not* be as secure as qmail! Walking through harlem with $100 bills hanging out of your pockets isn't smart! Sky is blue!
Some people just never get the news....
Just deploy Windows 2000 DDNS + Active Directory + Windows 2000 Kerb5 on the internet.
This will weed out all those unix crackers anyway.
The Internet is depending on unsecured servers for DNS? Now how am I going to sleep at night? Next you'll be telling me the earth isn't sitting snugly atop a giant turtle! Is nothing certain any more?
otherwise, someone might actually implement this while its still useful ....
In other news, the ICANN today approved the use of 'electricity' on the Internet.....
Real men surf the net using ip addresses. (And NOT in base 10)
As long as no one opens their mouth about possible security leaks, we'll be safe.
Last post!
This time I will be prepared.
/etc/hosts file so I can be immune to the attacks
I am downloading as we speak all the DNS records in the planet into my
I encourage others to do the same.
ICANN would like to replace the root DNS systems with secured servers.
/etc. Then, a patent would be granted for "a static internet address to domain name mapping system" and "a static domain name to internet address system"
/. before, but there are many people who run their own DNS roots, underground dns if you will. Anyone have any links?
Ok, how long before someone at ICANN suggests that the servers should maintain domain to ip mappings in static files. Something like a file called hosts and that could be stored in
Sorry, I'm just in a sarcastic mood given the fact that they actually use bind. Does anyone find that a little scary?
I know it's been brought up here on
Chaos, Mayhem, and Destruction: Not
The answer is simple, just ask the author of IPF how he did it...
Change the BIND license to make it much more restrictive, then sit back as the OpenBSD developers build their own simpler, better, more stable, and much more secure, replacement.
SSH.
IPF.
BIND?
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
100 Gb hard disks are cheap nowadays, and almost all OS support > 2Gb files. So securing the DNS from the roots up is simple : have a local /etc/hosts file with all existing hosts.
/etc/hosts file up to date.
Then, subscribe to a mailing list that sends daily changes, so that you can keep your
Ehm... yeah. You first have to secure mail to do this.
{{.sig}}