Slashdot Mirror


Exposing Spammers For All They're Worth

llywrch points out this interesting story at Art & Farces in which a "guy fights spammers by occasionally sending an email telling the spammer to leave him alone or he'll bill for time & services. Some take him off their mailing list, some pay the bill, but most don't respond . . . except one guy who was so incensed at receiving this invoice he had his lawyers send a threatening note. Makes it easier for Fraase to collect on his invoice."

17 of 548 comments (clear)

  1. Fukk linecks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    fukkme im a furry tr00l

  2. hmmm /. effect allready? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Ok all questions of FIRST POST!!! aside, the site already refuses connections? damn that was fast.

    IANAAC (I Am Not A Anonymous Coward) i am just too lazy to register

  3. KABLOOEY! Slashdotted. by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Is that a record?

  4. Re:Exposing CmdrTaco for all he's worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    What the hell is "taco snotting"?

  5. Re:Anus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    havent you heard the goatse ip address? its 209.242.124.241/goat

  6. I know how to get spammers for good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    sign them up for a daily goatse.cx mailing list!

  7. Re:Anus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hey! Are you looking at my ass?

  8. oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    You CAN make money fast online!!!

    http://www.thehumorsource.com/Joke.php?ID=332

  9. Here's another sort of Exposition altogether by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    in 1934, Dr. Habuto, an
    obstetrician, decided to do some careful, quantitative research to see
    how many women were wearing underwear. He went to the Ginza district
    of Tokyo where he had discovered a place where the position of
    buildings created what amounted to a wind tunnel through which many
    people a day passed. The wind blew so strong that few women were able
    to keep their skirts, robes, etc. from blowing open or upward. Little
    did they know that Dr. Habuto, dedicated public servant, was watching
    to see if they were wearing underwear. According to the results, the
    majority of women wearing European-style clothing wore underwear and
    the majority wearing Japanese-style clothing did not. Because those
    wearing Japanese-style clothing outnumbered those wearing Euro-
    pean-style clothing two to one, the majority of women were not wearing
    underwear. We should note that the Ginza was the most upscale and
    sophisticated part of Tokyo and was therefore likely to have the
    highest percentage of women attired in European-style clothes. If Dr.
    Habuto's research is accurate, therefore, we may conclude that in
    1934, very few women in Japan wore underwear despite all the attention
    devoted to the topic in popular discourse of the time.

  10. Some Medival Torture for Spammers by t0qer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anyone watch Jerry Springer last Friday? They had a 400lb guy on that was wearing a spam suit, I had to put down what I was eating when I saw it. Perhaps they should make spammers watch that episode over and over, with monty pythons "SPAM SPAM SPAM" played in the background. Pound the word SPAM into their heads so hard that they become lucid and start repeating the word SPAM SPAM SPAM uncontrollably.

    Or we could wire them up to this little evil device. Connect the router traffic led to a relay, connect the other end of the relay to the button on a stun gun. Everytime there is a reply to their spam they get a shock.

    Hmm i'm still feeling evil here folks. Construct a device that is like the house arrest anklets they make DUI people wear except put a electric shocker on there. Unless they repeat "I am a spammer idiot who is nothing more than a sunday driver with bandwidth" into the voice recognition unit on the anklet every 2 minutes, they recieve a shock.

    Maybe we should just go back to the good 'ol town square stockades and sell rotten fruit for some good 'ol public humiliation.

  11. Re:Actually do something and I'll be impressed by cburley · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I hate spam, but I don't really think the government should be getting involved. They take enough liberties away from us. If they make more crap illegal then it'll be turned around and used against otherwise normal activity and pretty soon we'll have tons of law telling us what we can and can not do with the internet.

    Drop the Republican anti-government hate mongering.

    Hmm, so when someone expresses concern about civil liberties being slowly eliminated, that's "hate mongering"??

    Wow, I'm sure your comrades from the old indoctrination camps are impressed.

    (At least it's good to know that knee-jerk reaction to someone treading carefully around civil liberties identifies them as "Republican" for a change...though I suspect that has more to do with the choice of the phrase "hate mongering" than with the issue of "civil liberties".)

    As far as the other adjective, "anti-government", is concerned, I find it interesting that when someone says government should be kept small, effective, and non-intrusive, they're "anti-government", but when someone tells a friend that they should lose excess fat, or should figure out what they most want to do in life and focus primarily on that, or should keep their noses out of other peoples' business, they're looking out for that friend's well-being rather than being "anti-friend". Hmm.

    Something for those interested in /. moderation to think about: the post I'm replying to was scored at +5, Insightful, while the post he was trashing was at only +2, Informative (though that author's response to the "hate-mongering" post was at +3, Insightful).

    Which does that suggest most about /. moderators:

    • They find posts expressing concern about over-regulation opening the door to eliminating civil liberties less worthy than those restating the legal status of various forms of spam and opining that e-mail spam should be illegal.

    • They love any post that starts off with a phrase like "Drop the Republican anti-government hate mongering", despite the fact that there's no evidence in the parent post of either Republicanism per se or hatred at all.

    I'm guessing think it's about a 50/50 proposition....

    --
    Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  12. Re:For all you Missourians by bani · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I've submitted the details of my success twice to slashdot but my stories are always rejected.

    Yep. slashdot is just B R O K E N .

    I suggest you try kuro5hin.org instead.

  13. Slashdoted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Slashdoted... No Google... Me unhappy =(.

  14. Re:Troll Tuesday by the_real_bayliss · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    You seem to post a lot... are you talking to me?

    (I assume this because I have a 'shiny new fake username')

    Well guess what...

    My name really is Bayliss. HA!

  15. Re:I've had things like this happen to me. by erroneus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You sure showed them. And just think, now that you spent 10 minutes writing a reply, sending it to the spammers, and bragging about it on slashdot, you have a lot more in damages to sue them over then the 1 second of your time to hit the delete key.


    You have no idea what damage "spam" does do you? You think the "Slashdot effect" is profound? How about the effect that spam has on ISPs but to mention people who have their email boxes needlessly filled with crap. Furthermore, thanks to vulnerabilities ala Microsoft, users are exposed to even more of such annoyances through pop-ups and pop-unders.

    The annoyance at users', ISPs' and mail adminstrators' expenses should be halted. The argument "just delete it" doesn't hold water since in most cases the email must be opened and downloaded in order to delete it.

    Furthermore, I will add that porn spam, which exists in many forms has a special place in my angry heart. I'm a father of two sons. They don't need this crap in their boxes. Additionally, they don't need to read anything about penis enlargement, breast enhancements, herbal viagra or any other such related information.

    "Delete" yes -- Delete the spammer at the source, not the destination.

  16. Re:Spammer's Real Address by stud9920 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    (Score: -1, Offtopic)
    You can do much better : wait till you're moderator, choose some random regular poster, and bitchslap him ! If you do all of this to the same person, the /. scripts will see it, and reset YOU karma to 0. (Did that)

  17. Re:"Asshole fee" by sqlrob · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Spammers, on the other hand, aren't doing anything illegal.

    Actually yes, they usually are.

    • In some states, the spam itself is illegal
    • Fraudulent contact information in WHOIS
    • Use of open relays
    • Use of dial-ups as mail servers and web servers, usually against ISP TOS