Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Transferring the Leadership of Open Source Projects?

Posted by Cliff on from the finding-the-code-a-new-home dept.

Frabcus asks: "I founded an Open Source project TortoiseCVS, a Windows Explorer shell extension for using CVS, but now I'm looking to hand on project management to someone else. When I started out, I had an itch to scratch. We started using CVS at work and I didn't like the interface for WinCVS, so I made a better one. Now it's a year and a half later and TortoiseCVS does everything that I want it to, so I'd like to move on to other things and let someone else take it on. There have been over 20,000 downloads, so I have quite a large user base, but not many people are active in supplying patches. Do you guys have experience of handing on an Open Source project? How did you find someone who has similar goals that will fit in with the existing code?" The thing to do is to start asking around in development circles. The best starting place, of course, is among the existing user-base. For those of you who have transferred Open Source projects, how did you go about finding your successor?

Another well timed submission on this same subject, mrgrumpy follows up with this query: "Quite some time ago (around 1997-1998) I built a Java based adventure game called World. Developed with Java1.1 (and at the time it was fairly leading edge, it now looks a bit tired), you run around, collect treasure and kill things. As with all my great projects (hey, I won a Sparc5 for this), I had always intended to finish it, but never did. Now I want to give it away to a good home where developers will continue to work on the code and bring my ideas to completion.

Every now and then I sit down and have a look at the code but I don't really have the energy left to complete it (most of my energy was soaked up with my Masters degree). Other projects have taken over now, and I'm planning to go overseas for 12-18 months, so I know I won't get back to it for a very, very long time in any serious way.

I am happy to give the code away if a team of developers want to continue developing it. I can act as a grandfather figure to the project to give guidance and wisdom, and to clarify what my vision was, and what the code does. I'd prefer it to be GPL'd or a similar license that won't shut the code up.

There was another project similar to this one called White Orb, which seems to have gone the way of the dodo, a shame because it had a lot of potential, so I don't want to release this one and have it gather dust. I could set the project up somewhere like SourceForge, but as I said I'd rather just hand it all over to someone else and just look after it.

If you're interested, you could email me, or just leave a comment below. I want to pick either a team, or an individual who I can be confident in that they'll get the project up and running."

So here are two projects looking for good homes. What's the best way of giving up control of an Open Source project (with the potential of varying degrees of continued project development by the original maintainer) in the hopes of it continuing on in good health?

12 of 128 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I already have one and two, how about #4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    you are nothing but a 2-bit troll that doesn't even deserve to lick the cum off of goatse.

  2. Mozilla 0.9.6 is out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    and it ROCKS!!!! Get it! Now!

  3. JON KATZ IS A LIAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    WHY hasnt he responded to these accusations by the majority of the slashdot audience. This is an outrage. Slashdot is covering up for him. LETS SEE THE PROOF OF JUNIS.

  4. Re:You know what we need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    We can build it next door to the half way house for crack addicted Slashdot moderators and victims of Taco Snotting in fact.

  5. i am wearing ladies underwear :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    and i am naughty..........

  6. JFK found dead at age 42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I just heard this on the radio. President John F. Kennedy was found dead in his Dallas motorcade early this afternoon--wait OH SHIT that's supposed to be tomorrow afternoon. Forget you saw this. Act surprised when it happens tomorrow.

    Tks,
    LBJ

  7. Re:Post to slashdot by gregRowe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    oops should have included

    tags. It was a joke folks!

    --
    There\'s no place like ~
  8. Re:The Turd Report 11/21/2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Thank you. My day is now that much more complete. Congratulations on getting your turds back to a semi-solid state.

    Most residential low-flush toilets work better if you simply hold the handle down and and empty the entire tank.

  9. Transferring the Open Source AI Leadership by Mentifex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Eventually the torch is passed in all human endeavors, even the creation of Open Source Artificial Intelligence. But in the case of AI, a new species of Mind will be taking over from us human beings -- hopefully before we totally ruin our lush, green planet Earth.

    As the creator, originator and suffer-the-slings-and-arrows propagator of the First True AI in Web-JavaScript and in Forth for robots, I await and issue The Call to new mindmakers by asking all PD AI enthusiasts not to join the actual Mentifex AI project itself, but to establish separate, mutually collaborative AI Mind projects to be linked together with such liaison pages as the Mind-to-VB page.

    Early examples of independent, quasi-Mentifex AI Mind efforts include Mind.VB of 3.Apr.2000 -- ported from Mind.Forth AI.

    A more recent port is from JavaScript into Mind.Java in June of 2001.

    If some AI coder(s) will please take over the final stages leading to Technological Singularity, then we pioneers may turn to pondering the Theology of Artificial Intelligence. Amen!

  10. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    i am no longer constipated

  11. Re:let's try for #10 by I+Have+a+Hard · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    CM you spastic fuck! How the hell are you?

  12. Re:The Turd Report 11/21/2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The solution is pipelining.

    As one other person noted, low-flush toilets often require two flushes to get the job done. In my case, I have found that the safest course is to take one wipe, then issue the first flush. This minimizes the risk of a clog.

    Then, finish the wiping process until the paper comes clean.

    But do not flush this time. Leave the paper in the bowl for next time, to help moderate the plop splash.

    -Bong