GTK-- vs. QT
spirality asks: "The company I work for is getting ready to decide on a GUI Toolkit for
our Computational Modeling Toolkit (CoMeT, www.cometsolutions.com). We would like C++ compatibility and ports to various Unices and Win32 platforms. Not supprisingly we've come up with two choices, GTK-- and QT. I've attempted to compare the two by doing alot of web surfing and searching, but I've come up with things that are consistently one or more years old. So, the question I pose is what are the (dis)advatages of GTK-- and QT, and why would I choose one of these toolkits over the other? Overall functionality, momentum for future growth, ease of use, licensing, and pretty much anything else is relevant to our decision." With QT now at version 3.0 and GTK now in the 1.2.x revisions, maybe it's time to give the two libraries some fair comparison and discuss the new features, advantages, and disadvantages of each?
what next Taco, how about a rousing vi against emacs story?
Oh, first post for Jesus !!!!
I agree with you 100%. I've neve used GTK, nor do I know anything about it, but I seem to recall that a friend of my brothers girlfriend said he heard from someone that it was rough around the edges and had no development roadmap for the future. But, on the other hand, I did read an article on ZDnet a couple of years ago about QT, so I would say that it's a much better platform.
Qt is 3.0
Gtk is 1.2.x
Sure it's friday, but come on, thats easy 3.0>1.2, so the choice must be Qt!
Same reasoning shows that Windows 2000 are MUCH better than Windows 98 which in turn is slightly (by 3 point) better than Windows 95, which again are MUCH better than windows 3.11.
Sigh. Does you youngsters not learn anything today?
Thomas S. Iversen
...as everyone knows that the software with the highest version number is obviously the best.
(Score:-1, Sarcastic)