Slashdot Mirror


Where Art Thou, BSD Winmodem Project?

JRAC writes: "Not long ago, anyone with a winmodem had pretty much no hope getting it to work under Linux. Now with projects like linmodems.org, Linux users with a dreaded winmodem actually have a chance at getting Linux to detect their modem. I myself am a Linux user with a winmodem which works fine, because mine has a Lucent chipset, which has fairly good Linux driver support. But I am trying to migrate to FreeBSD. I knew when I installed BSD that I had no chance getting my modem working, but it didn't bother me. Now after spending hours searching Google trying to find some Lucent drivers for FBSD, I have started to wonder when is someone going to start a BSD winmodem project? Aren't there any winmodem users out there running BSD that are tired of downloading drivers only to find they don't work. What we really need is bsdmodems.org"

7 of 29 comments (clear)

  1. here's idea why the project isn't happening yet. by markjugg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I use FreeBSD as a home machine, and went through some pain to figure it wouldn't recognize my modem because it was a WinModem, and replaced it with a conventional modem.

    I think the reason there isn't more happening here is that FreeBSD is focused more on the server market. If you are running a server, you probably aren't using modem, you probably wouldn't want a WinModem, or you wouldn't mind paying for another modem if you needed to.

    I would like to see the project happen as well. However, I knew that Linux has going to have better support for the Desktop environment when I set up the machine, and could have used that and gotten WinModem support on the same hardware if that was a priority.

    In my case, I use FreeBSD widely for projects at work, so I chose to keep things simple by keeping the environment consistent at home.

  2. Why? by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This isn't meant to be flamebait, but why bother? It sounds like a great deal of work just to implement a fundamentally flawed concept. Real modems are cheap, work well and don't suck up expensive CPU cycles.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  3. The drivers exist as .ko by Leimy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Kernel modules have existed for linmodems on BSD in the past. I "stumbled" over them a few months ago... [up to 6 months ago]. Check daily.daemonnews.org... They may have some information...

    Or you could just buy an external modem like everyone else in the world suggests.. Of course if you have a laptop this is a completely different problem. FBSD currently has shaky cardbus support so you woul have to obtain a REAL PCMCIA modem card and not a 32bit cardbus card. [PCMCIA is only 16bit if I recall correctly]

  4. Caller ID? by aozilla · · Score: 2

    In theory a winmodem could process the caller ID signal, right? Has anyone actually done this, or at least started to work on it?

    --
    ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    1. Re:Caller ID? by mattdm · · Score: 2

      I've never done this with a winmodem, but just plain old modems do this fine. AT#CID=1 (or #CID=2 for unformated output). I assume if you got a winmodem working and it supported caller id, it'd be the same.

    2. Re:Caller ID? by aozilla · · Score: 2

      I haven't looked into the details very much, but my intention is to eventually set up my own analog PBXish system. I'd imagine that a regular modem isn't going to be able to handle things such as sending a 90-volt AC wave at 20 hertz in order to ring the phones when a digital call comes in over the internet connection.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  5. Re:It's obvious by tjwhaynes · · Score: 2

    There's no funky name like "linmodem" that's appropriate for BSD.

    BuSteDmodem.

    moDaemon

    Or even (and you might take this as advice if you have a winmodem) Binmodem.

    Cheers,

    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.