Open Source And Genetics

UnanimousCoward writes "SFGate has an article about some researchers pushing for the open sourcing of genetic research software. Of course, the pros and cons are debated." It's the age-old debate; what follows the heart of the scientific method more? Peer review, or getting the information out as fast as possible?

Comments

Should be LLS Source

[SolidCore]

One of the major arguments around open source software is the question of "free speech or free beer". The distinction is frequently drawn by using the words libre to indicate the freedom of action in OSS (e.g. to distribute modified copies) and gratis to indicate freedom from cost.

LSS is very much libre. Users of LSS packages are free to distribute copies without reference to the authors, make modifications and distribute the modified copies. They may even execute the software without charge, provided that they do it for a purpose for which the authors do not require payment, and the definition of LSS ensures that any LSS package can be executed for experimental purposes. However LSS is not always gratis. Some uses of the software will require payment.

The word "liberal" is derived from "libre". It denotes freedom of action. Hence "Liberal Source Software". The source is available, and you can do what you like with it.

Re:for dummies...

[Anonymous Coward]

there are a number of the aforementioned books available. check your favorite online book store . . .