Japan to Allow Human-Nonhuman Mixed Cloning

Sara Chan writes: "Japan has decided to allow combined human-animal embryos to be produced through cloning, which could result in mixed-species creatures. The intended purpose is to permit transplant organs to be produced in specially-bred animals. The original story is in a Japanese newspaper, but you can get an English summary here."

Comments

Gigantic moral issues

[PoiBoy]

Whether this is scientifically feasible is a trivial question compared to the ethics of such an endeavor. If one believes that humans are different from animals in that we contain a spirit and an awareness of God, then should a cross between a human and an animal be considered an animal or a spiritual being? Moreover, as an advanced society, do we really wish to combine our gene pool with that of an animal?

Is this a step forward for mankind, or a step backward?

Re:Gigantic moral issues

[Chasuk]

If one believes that humans are different from animals in that we contain a spirit and an awareness of God,

Religious belief doesn't deserve a special category, and should not be confused with ethics. I can think of several ethical objections to this type of research, and none of them involve a belief in God(s) or ensoulment.

Moreover, as an advanced society, do we really wish to combine our gene pool with that of an animal?

As we are animals, this question could almost be considered facetious, but I doubt that was your intent. The question should perhaps be:

As a society, advanced or otherwise, should we engage in research which mixes human and non-human gene pools?

My ethics ascribe nothing special to the state of being human (or nothing which would be pertinent to this debate), so the question, for me, becomes:

Should we engage in research which involves the mixing of interspecies gene pools?

Yes, we should, or at least we should not restrict ourselves from such research without solid, logical reasons. This reasons may also be ethical reasons, as logic and ethics are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

Re:Gigantic moral issues

[aozilla]

Whether this is scientifically feasible is a trivial question compared to the ethics of such an endeavor. If one believes that humans are different from animals in that we contain a spirit and an awareness of God, then should a cross between a human and an animal be considered an animal or a spiritual being?

Sounds like a good way to find out. Create one and ask it.

Re:won't fly in the USA

[Yorrike]

All I can say is, FINALLY!

A country has the guts (and yes, I'm not surprised it's Japan), to go about ignoring the stupid religious morals set by the US in regard to cloning animals/humans with the specific end of using them for organ harvesting.

I'm one step closer to being able to have a genetically perfect pancreas transplant, which means I'm a step closer to being able cease these stupid insulin injections 4-8 times a day.