AT&T Ends Bid To Buy @Home Assets
thumbtack writes: "In the neverending story of the @home saga it's being reported (on the Excite Portal which is not going under) that AT&T has broken off their bid to purchase Excite@home assets. They cite a number of significant contractual breaches and other violations by the bankrupt broadband Internet access company. In another related story Comcast and Cox say they have inked separate $160 million dollar deals to continued service while they develop their own networks.
AT&T say that as of Tuesday morning they have moved 500,000 of their subscribers over to their network."
I don't understand what is going on at all.What exactly does (did?) Excite@home own?
Excite@Home was a combined company that ran the Excite portal, and the @Home ISP.
Did they do business with At&T, or with consumers directly?
With AT&T, Comcast, Cox, Charter, and a number of other cable companies.
What is AT&T@Home?
AT&T@Home was @Home service provided through AT&T to their broadband customers
And At&T Broadband is presumably the cable TV operation of AT&T?
Yes, along with digital phone service and internet access.
Think of @Home as an ISP, like Mindspring, AOL, or whatever. Think of the cable company as the phone company. With a standard dialup ISP, you use the phone company to connect to your ISP. With high speed cable access, you used your cable provider for a dedicated connection to @Home's service.
If you decide to change dialup ISPs, you change the number you dial. In this situation, the cable companies are unplugging their connection to @Home, and plugging into a different provider's network.
The main reason I chose to look elsewhere is their new subscriber agreement specifically states that you are stealing their service if you hook up another computer to the network:
So... for those of you staying with AT&T Broadband, you better tell them about masqueraded hosts!Get rid of everything Micro and Soft: Buy Viagra and/or Linux