Slashdot Mirror


Battlefield Lasers

KeyShark writes: "An article on FoxNews describes how front-line troops soon will be protected by battlefield lasers designed to shoot down rockets, artillery shells and even mortars."

3 of 688 comments (clear)

  1. Govexec.com says by hether · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0401/042301nj.htm

    that "These lasers also have a drawback--their energy comes from large tanks of industrial chemicals, which have to be mixed until they glow, like an outsize high-school science project. And they are so bulky that one weapon fills a large aircraft, or a small building. "

    Does this jive with the fox news article?

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  2. What about good old reflection? by Remote · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, the system was reported to be able to melt down Katyushas. My bet would be that those were painted gray or olive green. What if one chrome-plates the damn thing? Would that make the rocket (or a shell, or a racing pigeon!) laser-proof? Would someone in the know tell me why this wouldnt be a protection?

  3. Re:hard part by isomeme · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey, any laser powerful enough to damage or divert artillery shells is going to make *thunder* when it fires. It's the same effect as lightning -- superheated air shocks away from the beam, then slams back in when the beam cuts off. That's way more impressive than zzzzt-whoosh-bleem, far as I'm concerned.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.