Thermal Solar Plant To Be Erected In Australia
connect4 writes: "An article from the bulletin explaining a plan to erect a 1km high solar convection wind turbine in outback Victoria - the worlds tallest construction. Projected output per tower: 200MW. Cost to build: A$670m. Footprint of tower: 20sq km
."
-
Maintenance costs? I mean, you don't just whack a great big building in the middle of nowhere and expect it to just work for the rest of its life, do you?
-
Expected life span? If it only is good for ten years, it's a bloody expensive way to generate electricity.
-
Effect on the surrounding area? A one kilometer tower is going to cast a pretty damn big shadow.
-
Expected average output? 200 MW peak output is what the article says... that's not the same as 200 MW average.
Don't get me wrong -- I reckon it's a rather neat idea. But the article doesn't give the whole story by any means.This stuff could be VERY useful in near-tropical regions. like India for example, the temperature difference (in the more extreme parts ~25N) goes from 40deg C (in the daytime) to something like 10-15 at night. So this could also possibly be used to churn out far more power than the aussie counterpart, IF used correctly. This is specifically for regions that have a high temperature during day/night times, and a nice dry climate. Coastal regions wouldnt be of so much use for the simple reason that the temp. gradient obtained is not so large.
US is now divided as the "Red" and "blue" states. Red States = communist countries. Coincidence? I think not