Slashdot Mirror


Webcasting and the DMCA

nknouf writes: "A recent article on Salon talks about how college radio stations that webcast could face fee increases from $623/year to $10,000 to $20,000 per year. What's more interesting is information that Congress is considering a bill called the Music On-Line Competition Act, co-sponsored by Rep. Chris Cannon, R-Utah and Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va. The bill aims to "break the hammerlock the recording industry has over music distribution." My favorite quote, from Rep. Cannon: Napster is "one of the coolest inventions of modern times.""

2 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. HR 2724 link by Oily+Tuna · · Score: 4, Informative

    More permanent link to the Music Online Competition Act

    HR 2724.

    --
    Mmmmmmm ... sushi.
  2. IP is not "property" and isn't subject to "theft" by yerricde · · Score: 4, Informative

    Slashdorks can agree with any politician as on as they support the theft of intellectual property

    The U.S. Constitution recognizes it not as a birthright but as a tool "to promote the progress of science and useful arts" (U.S. Const. 1.8.8) "Copyright" is a misnomer; it really should be "copyprivilege". The law doesn't recognize intellectual "property" as property at all, especially considering how it treats transfer of exclusive rights. Copying another's work isn't termed "theft" but merely "infringement" on a government-granted privilege. Besides, with enough storage space, I could generate and store every melody in the book or at least a melody confusingly similar to every melody in the book (thus killing practical trademark law).

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?