Slashdot Mirror


MicroElectroMechanical Systems in Review

jscribner writes: "Tis the season for tech forecasts and wrap-ups; I got to post this discussion on www.research.ibm.com; it's about how (merely 30 years after Feynman's speech) nanotechnology is finally being applied to chip and storage technologies. The IBM Research article covers RF (Radio Frequency) MEMS, micro-actuator MEMS, and the Millipede project. You can also find some interesting material on IDA's MEMS site and the IEEE/ASME Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems."

63 comments

  1. Feynman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Feynman was an effeminate poofter.

    Most scientsts are.

    1. Re:Feynman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Most scientsts are (effeminate poofters).

      Except Doctor Octopus.

  2. New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    So, what's the plan for the New Year's Eve?

    Drinking alone a lot, goatse-watching and masturbation?

    1. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I plan on getting really drunk and playing a lot of ping pong.

    2. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      I'm going to get drink myself silly in the company of a mixed bunch of computer illiterate artists, humanists and weirdos.

      It'll be an interesting night.

    3. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I shoot humanists on sight.

    4. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      I like them. Especially the pretty, young and intensely opinionated female humanists and artists are great fun.

      Some of them are pretty smart, too, and if you're capable of carrying out a civil conversation about art, literature, politics and/or relationships they tend to take a liking (sex ;-) to you.

      So, just tone down the technobabble and enjoy a relaxed conversation about nothing...

    5. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I thought they were all lesbians...

    6. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      They wish they were lesbians...

    7. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Man, you couldn't be more wrong. Where do you get sex anyway?

      Most women students at my tech uni are either fugly, complete sociopaths (i.e. male geek stereotype squared) or both. And the small minority that doesn't fit in this categorization is, of course, married already.

    8. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      You forgot filthy rag wearing, rasta wannabie, trust fund sucking, SUV/Volvo driving assholes.

    9. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      You sound bitter. Been told to "piss off" by a beautiful art student too many times?

      Here's a crashcourse for you:

      1) Technology is not the pinnacle of the human cultural evolution. Art and literature, for instance, are much more mature and not a bit less important parts of our culture.
      2) Creations that do not have (immediate) financial value are not worthless because of that.
      3) Capitalism, conservatism and rightwing politics are not the best and only way to build a society.
      4) Environmentalists do address some valid and real problems.
      5) Not every question/problem needs to have an answer/solution.
      6) Intelligence and education is not a valid measure of how good a human being you are.

    10. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      At work. Well, lots of girls FROM work. Rarely actually at work.

    11. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Do you just make this shit up as you go? I think, maybe number 6 was right. That's about it though.

      No, I'm not bitter. I'm bi myself, and have a few lesbian friends. The parent post's tone seemed to embody several of my friends. Just joking dude. Slow down.

      No, I don't get told to piss off by art students. Round here, they're not attractive... not even a little.

    12. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I will not hear any more bashing of capitalism! Name one country that thrives on a system other than capitalism! And by thrive I mean: decently fed, free to determine there own life etc...

    13. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Do you just make this shit up as you go?

      Of course I don't. I planned this entire thread months beforehand. ;-)

    14. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Women artists also tend to be control freaks. Bitchy control freaks. Weird looking bitchy control freaks.

    15. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Of course I don't. I planned this entire thread months beforehand. ;-)

      Which gives credence to my theory that everyone in the world are actors putting on a show to entertain and horrify me.

    16. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Even if every nation on the world practised capitalism that wouldn't constitute as a proof that it is the best and only way to build a society.

      I'm not proposing that capitalism should be replaced by socialism. What I meant with that point was that it is OK and definitely not a waste of time to discuss the weak points and social shortcomings of capitalism.

      I'm really bothered by people who seem to think that capitalism equals democracy and that if I criticise capitalism I'm attacking democracy.

    17. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Yeah, so?

      Intelligent and mentally strong (to the point of being dominating) women who wear a lot of piercings and dark eye makeup are damn hot.

    18. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I couldn't give two shits about what 'system' is best. The important things are Democracy, Freedom and Education. Most socialist governments give you two out of three.

    19. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Democracy, Freedom and Education

      I wouldn't say the USA or UK would get three either.

    20. Re:New Year? by Sarcasm_Orgasm · · Score: -1

      I may be the only homeless person who breaks into radio shack at night to get on the internet & troll slashdot, but I believe there isn't a country that thrives with capitalism! Find me a country with 0% hunger & I'll give you one of my pet dead pigions.
      --
      Light on the Sarcasm, & Heavy on the _Orgasm

      --
      Special people have long socks, ride short buses, & invent witty sigs.
    21. Re:New Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      If you don't have any money, 4 years of college is basically free at most public universities. And for the other two, the US practically invented them.

  3. *BSD is dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    And Linux is gay!

    1. Re:*BSD is dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfff... Linux may be effeminate, but it's not gay compared to *BSD. Hell most of the BSD developers are fucking fudge-packers.

  4. Slashdot Awards 2001 by ringbarer · · Score: -1

    Most. Boring. Article.

    --
    "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
    1. Re:Slashdot Awards 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Least. Correct. Grammer.

  5. SCI-Fi by digitalunity · · Score: 1

    Anyone else read nano-tech sci-fi shorts? I love 'em. Can't get enough.

    So, when do I get my assembler?

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    1. Re:SCI-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      No.

    2. Re:SCI-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Maybe you should. They're good stuff.

  6. I just wanna say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    that Lincoln Park rockz!! They're, like, dreamy and shit.

    But when I searched for "linkin park penis", these were the top results.

    1. Re:I just wanna say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      D00d, Staind is where it's at!

  7. Woooha!! Sister-fucky time! by The+WIPO+Troll · · Score: -1
    I LIKE TO FUCK MY LITTLE SISTER! (AND OTHER SHIT) By The WIPO Troll, $Revision: 1.3 $

    Whats black, blue and green and doesnt like sex? The Girl Scout locked in my basement. Whats the worst part about having sex with a six year-old? Getting the blood out of your clown suit. Whats the best thing about getting a hand job from a five year-old? That little hand makes your thing look really huge. Guy comes home from work to find his girlfriend sitting on the porch, crying. Whats wrong, honey? Im leaving you! I just found out youre a pædophile! Pædophile? Why, thats a pretty big word for a ten year-old. How can you tell when your sisters on her period? When your dads dick tastes like blood! Two pedophiles are lying on a beach tanning, one turns to the other and says, Excuse me, youre in my son. Whats 18 inches long, blue, veiny, and makes a woman cry? Crib death. How could the mans seven year-old son tell that his dad had fucked his eight year-old sister? His dads weiner tasted like blood! Watson returns home to find Holmes in bed with a child. He shouts, Is this some sort of a schoolgirl? Holmes replies, Elementary, my dear Watson. So I was having sex with my girlfriend, and I decided I wanted to get kinky and try and do her in the ass. So I slipped around back; she looked over her shoulder at me and said, My, how presumptuous of you. I said, Presumptuous? Thats a big word for a ten year-old. Two guys are walking down the street when a beautiful woman passes. The first guy says, Damn! Id love to tear her clothes off, do her in the rear, smear my fæces all over her, slice off her breasts, chop her into little pieces, put her in a garbage bag and toss her into the river! Second guy says, Yuck! Youre a sick bastard! First guy says, Whatre you? A fag? A kindergarten teacher is asking the kids what their father does for a living. All the kids answer except for Little Johnny. The teacher asks Little Johnny what his Dad does and Johnny replies, My dad is dead. The teacher says, Thats terribile, but what did he do before he died? Little Johnny replies, He turned blue and shit all over himself! A guy calls in sick to work. Whats wrong? asks the boss. Im sick, the guy replies. You sound all right. No, Im really sick. Believe me. Listen, you were fine yesterday, and we have a lot of work today. I want you in here. You cant be that sick! Dude, I just banged my sister. Dont tell me Im not sick. A little girl accompanied her father to the barbershop. While her dad received a haircut, the little girl stood next to the barber chair, enjoying a snack cake. The barber smiled at her and said, Sweetheart, youre going to get hair on your Twinkie. I know, the little girl replied. Im gonna get tits, too. An older man and a small boy walk hand in hand through the woods. Boy: These woods sure are spooky! Man: You think youre scared, Ive gotta walk out of here alone. Whats the difference between Neil Armstrong and Michael Jackson? One walked on the moon, and the other rapes little boys. Has anyone read Michael Jacksons new book, The Ins and Outs of Child Rearing? Q: Whats the difference between a dead baby and a golden delicious apple? A: I dont cum all over the golden delicious apple before I take a bite out of it. Q: Whats the difference between a dead baby and my girlfriend? A: I dont kiss my girlfriend after sex. Q: What is special about a dead baby over all other forms of life? A: You can achieve deep throat from whichever way you enter. Q: What do you have when you have four dead babies, take away two, and add five more? A: An orgy! Q: Whats the difference between a dead baby and a table? A: You cant fuck a table. Q: Whats white and bobs up and down in a babys crib? A: A pædophiles ass. Q: Whats the safest way to play with a baby? A: With a condom. Q: Whats more fun than feeling up a dead baby? A: Feeling up a dead baby with three nipples. Q: What does a baby and a Pinto have in common? A: Theyre fun to ride until they die. Q: What do you get whan you dislocate a dead babys jaw? A: Deep throat. Q: Whats the difference between a baby and a grandmother? A: Grandmothers dont die when you fuck them in the ass. Q: Whats the best sound in the world? A: Hearing dead babys hips crack under pressure! Q: Whats worse than a having sex with a dead baby? A: Having sex with a dead baby filled with razor blades. Q: How do you stop a baby from choking? A: Take your dick out of its mouth. Q: Whats worse than finding a dead baby on your pillow in the morning? A: Realizing you were drunk and made love to it the night before. Q: How do you make a baby cry twice? A: Wipe your bloody cock on his teddy bear. Whats better than sex with a twelve year-old boy? Absolutely nothing. ________________________________________

    Thanks to Fark.com for all of these wonderfully sick jokes! I couldnt have done it without you! And thanks to all the Anonymous Cowards who have flamed me, I have three words for you! YHBT! YHL! HAND!

    Apparently this post is extremely good at getting biters. According to an anonymous coward, Attorney General Ashcroft is also after little old WIPO Troll now, in addition to the Canadian cops-on-a-horse that another A.C. sent after me a couple days earlier. Well, this should be fun. Keep up the biting, Slashdotters!

    ________________________________________
    $Id: pedo-jokes.html,v 1.3 2001/12/27 19:00:21 wipo Exp $
    Copyright © 2001 The WIPO Troll. Verbatim crapflooding of this document is permitted in any medium, provided this copyright notice is preserved, and next time you take a dump, you think of the WIPO Troll and all hes done to make Slashdot a better place.
    --

    J. Wipo Troll, Esq.
    Crapflooder Associates
    Slashdot.org

  8. Better disks vs. cool technology by d5w · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I thought it was a nice arrangement in the article, having the last two sections of the article be about
    1. A cool, novel technology with tiny cantilevered sensor/writer tips over a polymer surface giving amazing data density, and
    2. An incremental improvement in magnetic disks giving finer control over the head positioning.
    Given the history of storage technologies, what odds does anyone here want to give to the commercial success of Millipede vs. magnetic micro-drives, even in small consumer applications that currently use flash?
    1. Re:Better disks vs. cool technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Quit pretending like you read the article. Karma whore!

  9. Devil's advocate by ConsigliereDea · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't hate me...I love the idea. Once people get them into products (cell phones apparently being one of the first) the applications of MEMS are endless. Maybe a coffee maker that has a working self-start timer? Mine never does. But to quote the article... "The Millipede advantage is not only more data in less space but also a lower cost-per-megabyte for consumers than flash. A 64 megabyte flash media card today costs around $100. A consumer could one day buy a postage-stamp-sized 5-10-gigabyte Millipede for potentially a lower price." How many companies are going to make this cost effective? Of course, the cost will drop eventually to make way for even more advanced technologies, but in the mean time will I be paying an exorbitant cost for something that is more than what I need? Cell phones are one thing, servers & data storage another, but how about how much my mechanic will charge me to replace one of these if they go into a car?

    1. Re:Devil's advocate by dgou · · Score: 1
      Consider the market for "souped up" car chips. At a recent local car show I attended, one of the salesy folks mentioned swapping chips between the Audi TT and the VW Beetle (I'm pretty sure that was the pair, but its been a while), then swapping them back in order to pass inspection. Lots easier for the common bloke to increase the performance of the car instead of having to bore out the cylinders, etc. etc. etc.

      The real question will be how stable can such small devices be in the conditions under the typical car hood (vibration is either an issue or a non-issue, probably not a middle ground there). With that little size involved, attacking the problem with hyper redundancy would be feasible. When enough redundant copies fail, pop, on comes the chip-is-brokey idiot light (or just overload meaning for the current "check engine" idiot light).

      If you get some kind of assembly noids (nano androids/bots) on the chip, it could actually change itself to tune for your style of use/driving (who said these had to be digital? They could just as easily be analog, with all kinds of funky non-linear response characteristics). He! Everyone could have their own custom chip. Probably enough room on the chip to replicate the control circuity to have a copy for each of the drivers who uses the car on a regly basis.

      "Control, control... you must learn control."

  10. millipede by tantrum · · Score: 1

    I only read through the article pretty breifly, and a lot of cool stuff was presented. However, how on earth are they going to be able to rewrite using the millipede thingy?

    1. Re:millipede by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      With a trackball and a fire button.

  11. It's about bloody time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I told you to post something good, like, a week ago. What took you so long. Here's a couple good ones.

    Q:What's better than 3 14 year olds?
    A:14 3 year olds.

    Q:What's red, bubbly, and scratches on glass?
    A:A baby in the microwave too long.

    I've got more, wanna here more?
    Say please...

    1. Re:It's about bloody time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      please please please!

    2. Re:It's about bloody time. by The+WIPO+Troll · · Score: -1

      Wee! Sure. Although I don't need all 6 million "dead baby" jokes, I already yanked out the pedophiliac ones from the rest, for my poast.

      --

      J. Wipo Troll, Esq.
      Crapflooder Associates
      Slashdot.org

  12. Applications by SevenTowers · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have been able to control individual atoms for a little while now, and this opens up a wide range of interesting domains. The basic principle came from research on the Snell microscope. Electrons have a non nul probability of existing outside of their electronic shell. They have an associated waveform that is made up of a whole number of cycles (1,2,3...) on a given electronic shell. The tunelling microscope detects electrons (with the help of a very thin piece of material positionned above a surface) that "exist" out of their orbit because they are a waveform. This creates a very small displacment of the tip due to magnetic forces, which is then detected by a doppler shift in a laser bouncing on the tip.

    The next step is to reverse the process : move the atoms with the help of a very small tip. This allows for the creation of practically anything. From microscopic valves to pistons, to electrical switches and transistors. The most recent techniques use an etching similar to the one used in making CPUs to build these nano circuits and pieces. The precision achieved is fabulous! People are working on ways to deliver medicine to specific areas of the body or make ultra high quality lubricants with these techniques. By having precise release mechanisms and guiding the nanorobots with a magnetic field, it is possible to release medicine on a cancer tumor, instead of everywhere in the body.

    The storage mechanisms works on similar grounds, providing a way to move matter in smaller and smaller increments, and due to the nature of the forces involved, in a very precise way too.

    --
    Imperium et libertas
    Autocracy and freedom
    1. Re:Applications by dgou · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Moving one atom/electron at a time is quite precise, but also very very slow to assemble any quantity of anything interesting. My personal guess is that these devices will first achieve practical application using some kind of massively parallel assembly mechanism that is chemical rather than mechanical. Either vacuum chamber deposition or perhaps some kind of repeated bathings of various soupy mixtures. Having nanobots roam the surface of a chip and create the circuitry is interesting, but potentially slow. Better to have 'em swarm over a finished board/chip and tweak/disable the brokey parts.

      "Control, control... You must learn control!"

  13. Increase your ejaculation by 581% by The+WIPO+Troll · · Score: -1

    SIMPLE PILL CAN INCREASE YOUR EJACULATION By 581%!!!



    NO Gimmick........REAL SCIENCE!

    Increase Ejaculation by almost 600%!
    Increase Sex drive
    Stronger Erections
    Longer Lasting orgasms!
    More Intense Orgasms
    Shoot up to 13 feet!

    New Medical break through has now created a revolutionary herbal pill that is guaranteed to increase your Semen and EJACULATION by almost 600% in just a few short weeks!

    This amazing new product works by simply taking 2 pills every day...


    Order Now!


    Order Now!

    Simply try these Amazing pills for 30-days and if after 30-days you do not experience both a huge increase in the amount of semen you ejaculate along with longer lasting more intense orgasms, simply send the empty bottle back to us and we'll refund you 100% of the cost including shipping. With this guarantee, our product must work for you... or we'll lose money on every sale!

    To order go to here or call 626-440-1747 M to F 8:00am to 6:00pm Pacific standard time


    -Winner of the BURDETT RESEARCH "GOLDEN STAR" AWARD-

    ALL NATURAL HERBAL COMPLEX CAPSULE

    RESULTS MAY VARY. NOTE: Go to here to be removed.

    --

    J. Wipo Troll, Esq.
    Crapflooder Associates
    Slashdot.org

    1. Re:Increase your ejaculation by 581% by Sarcasm_Orgasm · · Score: -1

      Ordered mine. It's always been my fantasy to squirt as much as my dolphin partner can. I'd really like to see the look on his face after i shot a 13 footer up his ass. He'd finally understand my being unconcious for 5 hours & not being able to take him back to the ocean.

      --
      Special people have long socks, ride short buses, & invent witty sigs.
  14. Don't hate me because I'm beautiful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You're reading this post on a fucking Macintosh, aren't you?

  15. Feynman's speech by tsprad · · Score: 1

    Um, hasn't it been more like 40 years? Or actually 39? I thought the speech was New Year's Eve 1962.

    1. Re:Feynman's speech by tsprad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops! Click the link first, dummy. December 29, 1959. 42 years.

    2. Re:Feynman's speech by jscribner · · Score: 1

      Hmm, yah, 42 indeed. It took ~30 years (early 90's) for MEMs to start appearing but it's 42 years (heh, as of tomorrow) since Feynman's speech.

      --
      JS - IBM Metaverse devteam
      The opinions expressed here are mine & not necessarily representative of IBM
  16. Science: nano-circuits breakthrough of the year by budGibson · · Score: 1

    In this special issue (membership required beyond TOC) Science magazine has named nano-circuits the breakthrough of the year. Nano-circuits should allow circuits several orders of magnitude smaller than what we currently achieve with the best chip technologies today. However, the editors note that commercial fabrication is still along ways off, and we don't even know what a nano-fab plant will look like. The interesting point is that this breakthrough appears to push forward the standard boolean logic design used by current computing machinery. Although quantum computing is not ruled out (I suppose), it is not a pre-requisite.

  17. Feynman by jpostel · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have to say that Feynman gets so very little credit in this field. He did not really create the concept of nanotech but he layed out a good theoretical framework around which others based their research. The article is worth a read.

    I have several of his books and the collected physics lecture texts. I highly recommend them. I see them as setting a standard for physics texts to follow.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/020150064 7

    --
    Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
  18. Mesoscopic vs. Nanoscopic by Doctor+K · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The comments I've seen all seem oriented to nanoscopic devices. That technology is still in blue sky phase (lots of potential, but nobody really knows what to do with it and it is still not practical for large scale manufacturing). Mesoscopic MEMs (devices on the order of microns in size instead of angstroms) are already used in commerical products. In fact, chances are, you already own a few and didn't even know it.

    Here is an article with some details oriented towards mesoscopic MEMs.

    Here is a neat picture of a Mesoscopic MEMs device.

    (Bias warning: the supervisor of my research group was co-author of this article.)

    Kevin

  19. Gammatwister source -- Illegal in Australia! by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ## Gammatwister 0.1 Released: 12/28/01
    ## Borderline psychotic RGB trig code by Bowie J. Poag
    ## Say NO to drugs.... Say YES to Gammatwister! ;)
    ##
    a=1;
    COUNTER=0;
    while true;
    do
    while [ $COUNTER -lt 625000 ]; do
    a=$(echo "scale=4; $a+.013" | bc -l) ;
    rgamma=$(echo "define abs(x){if(x
    Cut, paste, and enjoy. :)

    ~
    ~
    ~

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  20. Nanotech ideas by webwench_72 · · Score: 1

    As long as nanotech stays in the blue-sky arena, I think a great place to get a feel for the possibilities of nanotech is Neal Stephenson's book, Diamond Age. It gets a little loopy towards the end, but I'd still recommend it.

    --

  21. Very inaccurate article at ibm research by Bram+Stolk · · Score: 1

    The article at ibm reseach is sheer nonsense.

    I quote:

    "Cell phone components can't get any more compact using current chip technology"

    What a load of bullshit.

    Bram

    --
    Bram Stolk http://stolk.org/tlctc/
  22. You're right by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    The problem is that they are educated stupid. They can't compute a time cube.

    1. Re:You're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is 'absolute proof' four cell phones occupy one cell phone within the Time Cube, which means one useful cell phone could be 1/4 the size for those who are educated stupid.

      -- T1m3 Ky00b

      BTW: Don't miss the Time Cube discussion at MIT if you can help it!
      http://websis.mit.edu/searchiap/iap-4330.html

  23. MEMS hard-drive head wrists by BillX · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beow...nevermind

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  24. It's been more than 30 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will actually be 42 years ago tomorrow that Feynman first delivered the speech (on 12/29/1959 for those devoid of a date subtraction algorithm), according to the transcript link in the original post.

  25. MEMS not Nano. by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    One mistake I've seen several times here on Slashdot, and often in other media, is that MEMS is related to Nano technology. This is not a fact.

    MEMS technology is based on very well understood silicon chip production techniques (with a couple more stages usually :), and produces features of a size usually quite large by todays chip production standards, and not even close to atmoic scale.

    Nanotechnology is a VERY different area, targeted at producing operating mechanical systems at close to atmoic scale, with all the associated advantages. This is a whole different can of worms, with almost no relation to MEMS technology.

    As a basic exmaple, atmoic assembly is not possibly at a MEMS scale, but is at a Nano technology scale.

    MEMS is simply the best we currently do at production levels, this does not mean it's nano scale any more than any previous 'smallest' was. It cannot scale to Nano scale systems, as the problems (and requirements) are not related. MEMS is just very small mechanics/engineering, Nano scale is physics at it's worst.

    I personally feel the sooner TRUE Nano is seen for the unique advantages it holds the better, but often the smaller (hmmm...) advantages of MEMS cloud that issue.

  26. Millipede Rewrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the IBMs article Here the millipede is mentioned and that "[The] probes creep across the media surface to either pinch nanometer-sized indentations, or pits, such as those on a CD or DVD, that represent digital bits of information, or read back or erase previously pinched nanoscale pits."