Slashdot Mirror


Digital Music's 2001 Winners and Losers

An Anonymous Coward writes: "MP3 Newswire is running two articles that contain their top 8 MP3 winners for 2001 as well as those who top the loser category. So who is this year's #1 winner? The legal industry for all the billable hours they got to roll up thanks to RIAA and MPAA lawsuits. It's a pretty interesting read and the two articles solicit reader opinions on other potential contenders. I can think of Dmitri Sklyarov right off the bat, but I admit I'm not sure if he won for getting the charges dropped or lost for getting arrested in the first place. Rolling Stone has also run their own digital music winners and losers list for 2001."

2 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. Biased articles by browser_war_pow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally I consider MP3 itself to be a loser. It is owned and controlled by a cartel (Fraunhaugher and Thomson Multimedia) and people have to pay out their asses to use it. That is what prompted me to take a moral stance and rerip my entire ~160 cd collection into Ogg Vorbis (350k!). And yes, I know about the threats made against the Ogg project by Thomson......

    Seriously folks.... why are so many people still using MP3? It can't hold a candle to Ogg Vorbis or even Windows Media. It isn't open, it doesn't sound nearly as good as it has been hyped to, it produces files that are much bigger than an equivalent Ogg or WMA and well..... it's just lame now.

    Here's an example of what I mean if you don't believe me:
    I have a 350k Ogg of Prisoner of Society by The Living End that takes up 9.07mb on my hdd and the same song as a 320k MP3 takes up 10.5mb!

  2. Is the internet music industry really the loser by adamy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It seems to me that Internet Music hasn't really taken off yet. As I see it, here its the state of things.

    1. Some guy has musical talent (we'll ignore the talentless one's for now)
    2. If he want's to be heard, he needs to get signed by a major music label.
    3. The Label spends money to promote the artist, with the hopes of raking in future profits from successful music sales.
    4. Radio stations play the music pushed by the Labels.


    Now we have some new technologies:

    1. Streaming Audio
    2. MP3
    3. all the hardware to support it
    4. Popular web sites


    If I want to hear great new music, what should I do. Right now, even with the second list, I am stuck with the set up of the first list. If I am an artist (I am not...) And I want to get paid for my work, I also am stuck with the first list.

    As I see it the week link in the chain is promotion. Slashdot is a wonderful community. We have a list of quickies for the day. How about a weekly feature which posts Free(libre) music. Set it up like the Interviews where each person posts a link to an MP3/Ogg/tar.gz/bz2 file and then the top five/ten rated posts get listed and sent out to the sites that promote music.

    Yes It will democratize music, with all that it implies. I don't think there is any way to get around it. Niche music like free jazz will probably not be very popular...but we may be surprized with some of the crossovers.
    --
    Open Source Identity Management: FreeIPA.org