Slashdot Mirror


Attack of the Clones

ramakant writes: "It looks like George Lucas has really sold out this time. If you thought Jar-Jar Binks was bad, MTV.com is running a story that a few members of 'NSYNC will be making cameos in Episode II. I think the target demographic for these films has changed a little since the original trilogy. Oh well, at least LOTR rocked." The MTV article says that NSYNC asked for the part; an article in a UK tabloid says Lucas asked them.

13 of 691 comments (clear)

  1. has the targeted demographic really changed? by steeef · · Score: 5, Insightful

    after all, those of us who grew up loving star wars saw them originally as children.

    1. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not at all, they're all kid's movies but some people refuse to accept that fact that something they loved as a child isn't so hot for adults. Its mostly nostalgia kicking in, though Empire was slightly darker and meaner.

    2. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by squaretorus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. This is a fairy tale. Always has been always will be. It hapenned to be a pretty cool fairy tale with guns and stuff. But its still a fairy tale.

      The young female dollar is the hardest to tap into, and thus the one most ripe for new market share.

      The young female dollar worships celebrity. Get some celebrity in there and you might attract a 20% increase in the audience for Episode 2.

      This is exactly how Star Wars should be! You either grow with your audience, or you stick with the fairy tale. In these celebrity soaked times its the only way to win! You need something the chicks will want to watch 250 times over aswell.

    3. Re:has the targeted demographic really changed? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Insightful


      ...those of us who grew up loving star wars saw them originally as children.


      This gets bandied about every time Star Wars is mentioned. Especially after George Lucas used it to dismiss his fans' critisims from EP1. Star Wars is a kids movie. Anybody who claims otherwise are blinded by nostalgia.


      I don't buy it.


      Sure. I'm a sucker for nostalgia. There's lots of things I enjoy simply because I had enjoyed them in the past. But I can tell when I'm simply being nostalgic.


      There are plenty of examples within movies (and television). I still enjoy the first 3 Star Wars movies. I was disappointed in the 4th (EP1). Even now, comparing all four on VHS I get the same reactions.


      Distorted views through nostalgia lenses? Hardly. I used to enjoy some B-grade scifi, Buck Rogers, and The A Team. Now when I see these same works, I also see the small bits of why I thought they were so cool. But its also glaringly obvious why my father would roll his eyes and leave the room.


      Good, if not great, works remain so even if they were origionally seized by a younger generation. And uninspired works remain... uninspired.


      Star Wars was a suprise hit in an area that The Industry had, rightfully, disreguarded. It did something different and suceeded. Alas, that something is now lost to Lucas. He's sunk in to mediocraty. And his defense is our childhood.

  2. The Downward Spiral of Lucas by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    About three years ago, I sat in a theater that was about to show "Wing Commander." Why? Because they were going to show the "Star Wars" trailer. As the lights darkened and the projector fired up, the words "Lucasfilms" showed up on the screen. That was all it took to get the entire crowd to erupt in a tremendous cheer.

    Then, Ep I came out.

    Recently, I sat in a theater awaiting LOTR. "Lucasfilms" showed up on the screen. The audience collectively yawned. We've already been burned once by Lucas; we're pretty sure that AOTC is going to suck. Jar Jar, a lame-ass title, and now N'Sync pretty much confirm that.

  3. uh... a few seconds ruins a film? by Jish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article says a few seconds in a scene with a lot of extras...

    Get a grip... nobody will notice unless you freeze frame the future dvd and then who really cares...

    If you want to make an opinion of the film before seeing it (which is kind of dumb) then at least do something like watch the trailers... which in my opinion are quite good!

  4. The demographic hasn't changed. by mystery_bowler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lucas has always said that Star Wars is a modern-day fairy tale. Great love stories intertwined in a universe of Good vs. Evil where the Good Guys win. It's the stuff great kiddie stories are made of.

    I mean, hey, let's look at that first triology for a second. We've got a love story between a princess and an outlaw (whose best friend, by the way, is a large, loveable hairy guy). That's classic fairy tale stuff. Then we've got the tale of a confused and tortured young man struggling to become a champion of good whilst laboring in the shadow of his evil father who, as it turns out, is still a pretty good guy himself.

    I can't tell if this is a fairy tale or a soap opera. Frankly, there isn't much difference.

    The point is, Lucas made a film that adults can - more or less - enjoy, but it's always been heavy on the childish side of things. The story and characters are easy to digest. It doesn't take a literary genius to understand that the Emporer was an evil mad man and Luke was the proverbial White Knight. The story is cut and dry.

    But I will admit that including a boy band like NSync in the movie, even for a cameo, is bowing to market influence in a major way. Oh wait...there was Jar Jar and that whole "Pod Race To Sell Toys" scene in Episode I. :)

    --

    My sigs always suck.
  5. Bah... by tcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lucas diserved the money he made from the 3 first star wars, in that repect, I support him in every trademark dispute, piracy attacks, and anything that might go against his master piece of work and innovation(tm).

    But one thing is for sure, he lost *ALL* my respect with Episode 1, This was clearly a "coup de cash" against his loyal fans. Not only he deceived us, it's not like if he was under-funded or he had to make tough choices (jarjar is the "living proof of poor judgment). Now, he's in it ONLY for the money, he lost his soul and his artistic taste for the movies the same way metallica lost it's artistic side for money in heavy metal music. He had all the time in the world to make a masterpiece, he had all the funding available, he had all the talent, he had enough people around him to tell him what was a good and a bad idea, I guess fans sometimes are really harsh but there's no forgiving for such blattant mistakes and misjudgement; he knew what his fans were expecting and he betted only on the CGI technical skills side (like most hollywood producers) to save the day.

    You didn't see me crying when DiVX of his mastercrap went around the net, actually it even did some good; Remember when he commented on the editor that removed *EVERY* scenes where jarjar was? that it was illegal etc etc? Well, on a moral standpoint and to defend the same Trademark that Lucas is tarnishing by himself, I think it was the best thing that the internet and p2p technology could do to save the little content of the movie that wasn't half bad. It's still illegal though, but for someone who saw it at the theatre and gave in money like I did, I would have prefered paying an extra buck to see such a version.

    At first, my thought was, maybe I was expecting too much, maybe I've lost that amazement feeling you get when you're younger and seeing something truely fantastic, but LOTR proved to me that it wasn't gone, and SWEP1 should have given me that same feeling if not better. I didn't have such a harsh judgment before seeing LOTR, but what I saw is that you CAN match a buttload of CGI, a good story and good acting and still amaze people... and that my friends, at any age.

    Having NSYNC in there just shows the commercial side of lucas that has overtaken his artistic soul. What is it going to be? Big sync dance of Yoda and all his family? oh god, I can see riverdance comming for episode 3 and have a bunch of JarJar lapdansing for 10 minutes... oh and have him signing on top of that, and oh I can see vador joining the club and using the force to lift everybody in the air and and&#*H@IkKn3,22214m3,4

    NO CARRIER

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  6. Target Demographic: Lovelorn Teenage Girls by Digitalia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I saw an EP2 trailer at Lord of the Rings and it was enough to make me want to reach across the aisle and throttle someone. The only people in the theatre at the time who even enjoyed the trailer were the teenage girls, and the collective simper was horrifying. I can understand modifying the Star Wars we've all known and loved to sell it to the modern demographic, since 20 years does tend to demand certain variations in the theme to capture the interests of the same target. Yet the wholesale bastardization of a concept to attempt to make it appeal to all demographics is a work of marketry and not artistry. It's a damned foolish thing to do and a sign that Lucas has become nothing more than a sellout.

    I'd been rallying for another Indiana Jones movie for a few years now. This is the moment when I stop. As much respect as I have for the past accomplishments of Lucas and Co., I couldn't possibly tolerate the desecration of another franchise.

    --
    Pax Digitalia
  7. Holy shit, get a grip by bryan1945 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um, some guy makes a couple of films you like a lot. A while later he makes some more films that you don't like very much.

    At what point in this story do you figure at all? Don't bother saying anything about giving him your money, 'cause that was your choice. You don't want, you don't buy. Maybe if he came to your house and pointed a gun at your head to buy the DVD...

    Why does Lucas have some kind of "commitment" to you, rather than say Tom Clancy or Michael Chrichton (sp?)? They all produce a product, yet where is the outrage that Timeline made obsolutely zero sense?! (Ok read, but bugger the science!)

    "He's making the films for his kids! Burn him!" What, making a film for a bunch of whiny ass-monkeys would be a better choice? Sure, they are the luckiest kids on the planet, but still, I can't think of many motivations better than doing something for you kids.

    If you don't like what he's doing, sure complain about how it could be better (I sure did), but don't get so excited about how "he owes us more" or "it doesn't match my vision" or "a dog could do it better". He doesn't owe you jack and if you think you can do better, go prove it.

    End of long, dumb rant, but I'm kinda sick of people bitching like Star Wars was their exclusive birthright.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  8. The damage done... by Cplus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The damage done by having a boy band or any recognizable figure in a movie based around a universe, as Star Wars is, is that recognizing them draws you out of that universe and back into the real world. This would be true whether the reaction you have toward the person is negative or positive. As an example, I found it quite bothersome to see the "E.T.'s" in the Senate scene of Ep 1. I liked ET as a child, but it took my mind out of the Star Wars plane that it was dwelling in at the time.

    --
    "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  9. The demographic HAS changed. by krmt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lucas is, quite simply, out of touch with his own vision. No one argues that Star Wars is a fairy tale, and a damn good one at that. But look at what makes good fairy tales! Harry Potter is a prime example of a modern day fairy tale that has won the hearts of millions of fanatics of ALL AGES, much the way Star Wars did years ago. Toy Story is another example, where everyone loves it, kids and adults. LOTR is doing it in theaters right this very moment, some half century after its original writing.

    The fact is, Lucas did something once upon a time that was magic by creating something for people of all ages to love. You can't really say that about the new movies, something is missing. I think what's missing is both in Lucas and everyone else.

    The target demographic of the original movies was not really children, but everyone. Kids don't understand the concept of a Republic vs. an Empire and what that means, or the sexual tension between Han and Leia. That stuff is in there for adults too. And don't forget the violence (which is present in all fairy tales by the way, pick up the Grimms if you don't believe me) which is relatively absent from episode 1. No dead gungans lying around, they're too fucking marketable! Even the Ewoks were slaughtered en masse. These "adult" concepts are things that are very real, that reach out to us and touch us from inside and connect us to the story long after the fantasy has faded away. Harry Potter does this. LOTR does this. Why not episode 1?

    I wish I had an answer to these questions, but the fact is that Lucas is simply not targeting his demographic anymore. When he made the first movie, his priority was simply getting it made because he couldn't worry about anything else. Make the movie, and people will come. His demographic was the project itself. Now his demographic is what he thinks audiences will want from him, and he's bending things to this vision. He's not serving the story anymore, he's trying to serve us all, and in doing so he's cheating everyone of something that should have been great.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  10. Re:Umm, right. And Alec Guinness was from where? by hughk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Hamil may have sucked but Guinness was there with a very impressive history of appearences and IMDB being far from reliable, it omits his work as Smiley in the award-winning cold war espionage TV series based on Le Carre's books. He may have made more from Star Wars after historically agreeing to a percentage than anything else but his other stuff is definitely worth a look. Good actors do not make a movie, look at The Phantom Menace. Once we get away from Jar-Jar Binks (I don't blame the actor, Ahmed Best there), we have some heavies like Liam Neeson and Terence Stamp assisted by Ewan McGregor and Natalie Portman. All of these have done some good work, but this was not it! I often feel that having a script directed by its author is not the best idea. A director supervises the editing and must be able to say what gets left out. It always difficult to scrap something that you spent a lot of time on and frankly, Jar-Jar should have been left sitting on the cutting room floor.

    Maybe Lucas was more objective with himself in Star Wars 4: A New Hope. He was new (only one major film out, American Graffiti), and under a tight budget. His other film in the genre, THX1138 was well thought of but not widely distributed.

    If somone wants to be an extra and be shot at, I don't care. It is if they actually have lines then I start to get concerned.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there