Slashdot Mirror


Linux During The .Com Crash

freakboy303 writes "ZDNet has a short article that can be found here , It basically talks about what the last couple of year of gloom and doom mean for the linux world in general. It seems to me it would make it more appealing to .coms to use the free software but..."

3 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I thought that... by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 5, Funny
    ZDNet was owned by M$ anyway. That would give them some bias.


    That's why we come to Slashdot, because we know they're not biased!

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  2. .com answer by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny
    Buy the most expensive chairs and server hardware and licenses. Why not, money's cheap, right?

    (A .com in my building "moved out" just before Xmas - 100s of Herman Millers went into the rent-a-truck. Glad I wasn't an investor.)

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  3. In other news by Erris · · Score: 3, Funny
    a recent Goldman Sachs survey found that mainframes, Linux servers and supply-chain management ranked as the three lowest spending priorities for executives in Fortune 1000 companies. About 65 percent of executives polled by Goldman Sachs said they have no plans to use Linux at their company next year.

    In other news, 75% of Fortune 1000 executives polled claimed to have turned a computer on last year. Many thought that MS was a subsidiary of IBM that made new and improved typewriters and file cabinets. "Servers?", said one darting accross a hel-o-pad, "We've got the best stinking servers in the business. I have three personal assistants, two drivers, a pilot, as well as the usual secretarial compliment. We don't need anything from this Linux company we keep hearing about. Now go away, you bother me.!" Most found the concept of email good and had their assistants print duplicates for them and their files.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.