Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Code Update

You will likely notice a variety of changes in the comments system if you are logged in. Most of these changes surround the new 'Zoo' system which implements (among other things) a sort of killfile function, and much more. Logged in users have the ability to flag each other as Friends or Foes, and assign bonuses and penalties appropriately. So if a user annoys you, you can easily not read their comments any more. If you notice any bugs, feel free to submit them or let krow or me know.

12 of 569 comments (clear)

  1. "Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien" by mirko · · Score: 5, Informative

    In English : "Better is Good's foe".
    See that grey pearl besides your comment's details ?

    click on it :

    Slashdot Friend/Foe System

    So how do you perceive Cmdr Taco ?
    So how do you perceive cyborg_monkey ?
    So how do you perceive Klerck ?
    So how do you perceive Jon Katz ?
    ...
    Friend
    Neutral
    Foe

    Note: Who you like and dislike is not private; it can and will be used against you.

    Do you mean I may get sacked if I happen to feel some sympathy for some of the trolls ?

    I believe this is a little dangerous unless we have the guarantee that you are trustworthy enough to use this.

    Until then, well... Everybody is my friend.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  2. Re:killfile timothy! by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 5, Informative

    You've always been able to exclude story authors, its been in the preferences for a long time. Making timothy your foe won't do much since it seems to be an unwritten rule that Slashdot editors post comments on the site no more often than once every six months or something...

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  3. Re:Friend or Foe, not so private by kilrogg · · Score: 5, Informative
  4. Re:make CT a foe! by El_Koba · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nah... all you have to do is change op=addcheck to op=do in the query string.

    --
    "Freedom in cyberspace'd be fine and dandy if we happened to live there."
  5. Gnus has a slashdot backend by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 5, Informative

    which makes each /. article appear as a newsgroup, with the comments being the messages in the group.

    Unfortunately, one has to run the CVS version of Gnus for this to work, since it does it by parsing the html, and need to be updated each time /. changes format.

  6. Re:all this code... by Matts · · Score: 3, Informative

    Impossible.

    Seriously, think about it. There are about 3 million registered users on slashdot (shocking to think that you and I have user id's below 2000!). There are probably 20 new stories a day. Each story gets on average about 150 posts. So for each post you need to store one entry in a database per user.

    That's 9 billion new rows a day.

    Of course you could do some compression or bit-twiddling to reduce that, but not by a significant enough amount.

    The best you can do is what LinuxToday does - mark stories as "new" since you last refreshed the page.

    Usenet doesn't have this problem because all the "What I've read" stuff is stored client-side, and there's not enough room in cookies to do that.

    --

    Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
  7. Re:Same Code as Slash? by michael · · Score: 4, Informative

    Slash 2.2.2 was just released (actually, the friend/foe stuff has been live for some time, though hidden because the icons weren't on comments). Slash 2.3 is likely to be released before Linuxworld (end of January).

  8. Re:Changes we need on Slashdot RIGHT NOW by michael · · Score: 3, Informative

    Secure login - we're thinking about that. Expect to see it sooner or later.

    Browser sniffing - not likely.

  9. I see "Blacklists" and "Forced Logins"....... by bihoy · · Score: 3, Informative


    It occurs to me that this new feature could potential lead to the desire for two others.

    First, if we can individually mark someone as
    a foe then the next trend might be to create a
    list of individuals that the community regards
    as foes. The individuals could then choose to
    subscribe to this list if they feel they have
    common ground with the list maintainers. Thus
    community blacklisting would arrive on the
    internet (anyone intersted in copyrighting this?).

    Of course today anyone who has a desire to attack
    and defame the thoughts of others is going to post
    as an Anonymous Coward. Thus the second desire could be to make everyone accountable for their
    posts. This would, of course, require a "Forced
    Login" feature.

    I personally doubt that there are many members of
    this online community that would sanction features
    like these. Trends, however, start out as seemingly innocuous and small changes that over
    time turn into something that is bigger and larger
    than their meager beginnnings.

    The question then would be: Are we heading down a path that diverges from the original intent of
    a collaborative forum where there can be a free
    exchange of ideas unencumbered by that hideous
    beast called "censorship"?

  10. Re:killfile timothy! by hawk · · Score: 3, Informative
    >Maybe there's a reason for the unwritten rule
    >against posting.


    It's generally necessary to correctly spell *both* a name and a password to log in before posting. THus, about every six months, Taco succeeds :)


    [*duck*]


    hawk

  11. Re:Formatting of IMG suggestion... by docwhat · · Score: 3, Informative
    ALT is for (and I quote from w3c's specification):
    For user agents that cannot display images, forms, or applets, this attribute specifies alternate text.

    Where as the TITLE attribute is for:
    This attribute offers advisory information about the element for which it is set.

    Not that I can blame you for thinking otherwise, as most of the web is filled with horrible examples of HTML being abused.

    The above was from http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/objects.html#h-1 3.2

    --
    The Doctor What (KF6VNC)
  12. Re:AC? by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 3, Informative

    In your options you are able to automatically set AC posts to -1, and as long as your threshold is 0 or above, you won't see AC posts anymore.