Slashdot Mirror


Mars Odyssey Completes Aerobraking

Cally writes: "Space.com reports that Mars Odyssey has completed aerobraking and is ready to begin its main science mission. As the spacecraft has already produced exciting results before the start of the science mission proper, interesting data on the quantities of water in the Martian crust may be expected soon - not to mention that Odyssey provides another datapoint in the study of Gamma Ray bursts."

8 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. I'm sorry Dave... by funkhauser · · Score: 1, Funny

    Only a few million more miles until the onboard computer malfunctions and that trippy space sequence starts!

  2. NASA [aero]brakes... for the environment! by Tsar · · Score: 1, Funny

    By using the atmosphere of Mars to slow down the spacecraft in its orbit rather than firing its engine or thrusters, Odyssey was able to save more than 200 kilograms (440 pounds) of propellant. This reduction in spacecraft weight enabled the mission to be launched on a Delta II 7925 launch vehicle, rather than a larger, more expensive launcher.

    No small feat, there. Too bad they didn't use regenerative aerobraking—we might have gotten the spacecraft back.

  3. exciting results by solitaryrpr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, the preliminary exciting results would be that it didn't crash into the planet or just disappear.

  4. Re:Before it gets slashdotted by hooded1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't think you really have to worry about slashdotting NASA. I'm pretty sure they got a hefty amount of bandwidth. And chances are also that its not gunna get that many hits at midnight e.s.t

    --
    A rabbit in the hand is worth 4 in the cage
  5. Re:Dickhead moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Hey Dickhead, you just reposted what is in the artical. How is that NOT redundent? Hello McFly; it's not like NASA is going to get /.ed.

  6. The same old space exploration posts... by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I swear, Slashdot could post the most mundane story about space exploration, and it still draws the same old complaints about this and that, the usual space trolls. I'm just going to respond to them all here for future linkage.

    1.) If you have difficulty understanding exploration for it's own sake then you aren't "all for exploration."

    2.) If we knew of all the ways we could use and develop (insert name of celesial body here), then we wouldn't need to explore it, now would we?

    3.) Yes there are people dying in (insert Third World country here) of (insert Horseman of Apocalypse here). The reasons for these deaths are purely political in nature. Money is not the solution to all problems just as it isn't the root of all evil. If anything it becomes a scapegoat for the real causes of strife. I don't see how not spending the money on space exploration and letting Congress (of all people) spend it on (choice of one or more of the following: junkets, political campaigns, television commercials, Jesse Jackson, economic incentives, UN resolution, Jimmy Carter, "peace-keeping" expedition) to "make the world a better place" is really going to change a damned thing. (Name of two opposing ethnic, religious, or political groups here) need to talk to each other, and dangling money in front of their noses isn't going to get them to do that, it will just get them to chase that money.

    4.) As for education reform, go talk to your state and local governments. If you don't know why you should be talking to them instead of the federal government, then you are an example of how badly we need education reform.

    5.) Do you have any idea how small a percentage of the federal budget is spent on space exploration?

    6.) We are NOT on the verge of nuclear war! At worst, the only countries on the verge of nuking each other are (names of two nuclear powers that didn't sign non-proliferation agreements)! And they aren't the ones sending up these probes, are they?

    7.) With all the problems there are in the world today... why would you want to live in the world today? (name of celestial body) looks like a damned good alternative to me!

  7. Don't be so hard on them! by Nindalf · · Score: 3, Funny

    You think it's easy to make space probes that work perfectly?!

    They have to launch these fragile robots through the harsh interplanetary void, always mere inches -- no wait, was it centimeters? maybe cubits... fathoms? -- from disaster...

  8. Darn.. we missed! by Restil · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nasa once again launched a spacecraft at Mars. However, due to inaccurate calculations, the spacecraft missed its target and instead settled in a stable orbit, unable to crash into the planet and achieve its intital objective. A preliminary investigation blames a slight miscalculation due to the improper use of significant digits.

    Mission planners are uncertain how to proceed now that the mission has been officially declared a failure. "We now have a $250 million piece of equipment uselessly orbiting the planet." A small group of scientists has declared the mission "not a total loss" as this might present a rare opportunity to study the planet before the orbiter crashes into the planet naturally at some later date.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here