Slashdot Mirror


History of the Electronic Frontier Foundation

Well, no one submitted it (guess no one reads the LA Times), but from the Red Rock Eater list we have a link to Freedom Fighters of the Digital World, a laudatory history of the EFF. Read it, live it, remember it when you think "I can't make a difference".

18 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. LA Time Magazine by richard-parker · · Score: 3, Informative

    It isn't that no one reads the Los Angeles Times, it's that no one reads the Los Angeles Times Magazine .

  2. Airport security.. by onion2k · · Score: 4, Funny

    Airport security could employ advanced X-ray screening that looks through clothes

    *sound of 50000 nerds filling in application forms for 'airport security manager'*

  3. Print it out and make it your bible! by lcorc79 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In this post 9/11 world, sure - we need to think about security. But we need to remember PRIVACY! and all other freedoms we too-often take for granted.

    If most of us addicted to /. would take less time reading and bitching about all of these issues and spent some time actually lobbying and petitioning and holding rational discussions/debates on all levels (from the neighborhood greasy spoon to Washington), we'd see more of a difference.

    Don't like the Rosens of this world? [MP|RI]AA got you down? Worried about Carnivore? Take this not just as a reminder of an important (and neglected/forgotten) part of the net's history, but as a battle call...

    Seriously. Let's do something, instead of bitching. Don't post a comment unless you're going to write a congressman/woman or sign a petition today. I'm going right now...

    Peace.

    --
    Groove Salad -- a nicely chilled plate of ambient grooves and beats.
  4. Opportunists by guttentag · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Says Brad Templeton, a 41-year-old Internet entrepreneur and the EFF's chairman: "I sit in fear of the next attack not only because of who it might hurt but because of where it will take this debate."

    The attacks themselves had limited effects on the economy and infrastructure of the U.S., but they empowered several monsters to wreak havoc. The consumer confidence boogey man came and went. And after the smoke cleared, Americans felt safer from physical danger because they thought they knew the score.

    "If I don't get on an airplane or work in a skyscraper, I'll be OK," they tell themselves. "If I don't open suspicious envelopes and if I don't question the Patriot act, I'll be OK."

    But the opportunists still run amok.

    opportunist
    An opportunist is one who tailors his or her beliefs or actions to circumstances in order to advance his or her interests, without regard to principle. ( The Washington Post Deskbook on Style )

    It is unfortunate that there are opportunists in Congress who present a greater "threat to freedom" than Osama Bin Laden. Bin Laden presented them with the opportunity to seize power, and they grabbed it.

    The ACLU and EFF are the police and FBI that protect us from opportunists. Please familiarize yourself with their activities and support them.

    1. Re:Opportunists by KjetilK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Americans feel safer because we are actively pursuing our enemies.

      But does it have any effect? Do you really think what you do has any effect on their abilities? I seriously doubt it.

      Also, just think about the numbers: Salon had an article about a twelve year-old kid who had his entire family killed. Now, the only thing he wants to do with his life is kill as many americans as he possibly can. One thing you've got to ask yourself: Do you blame him? You killed his family, do you blame him for wanting to kill you? There is a lot of wisdom in "If we hate them, we will become them."

      While his ability to do so is small, there are thousands like him. If any of them can succeed in their life project, this is not the only time you're going to get hit. Yeah, and it doesn't really take that much to set off a nuclear bomb.

      Actually, what I find most discomforting about this whole matter is how surprised everyone seems to be. That the US would be attacked with a Hollywood-style terrorist attack is hardly surprising, terrorists have always wanted to do things like that. There was a really good cartoon about that in Ernie, I guess about 1993-1994, where terrorists wanted to buy Sid's vacuum cleaner to suck up NYC. That they would use planes to crash into buildings, well, novels have been written on the topic. That the US would move to attack somebody is not surprising at all, we all knew that would happen. I've been predicting for years that the US would eventually move to complete what the Russians didn't do in Afghanistan, namely insert the regime they wanted in Kabul. But I must admit that I am slightly surprised it went that fast.

      Nor is it surprising to note that civil liberties are attacked, there are strong forces who always wanted that, and they only needed the public's attention.

      Finally, the public opinion engineering that has been going on, wow, it's just like in Wag The Dog... What a prescient movie.

      You know, most people haven't cared about cryptography at all, so policy has been a tradeoff between the wishes of the hawks and the rational arguments of cryptologists. Of course crypotologists knew perfectly well that crypto can be used by terrorists, but the argument remains: Crypto is making society stronger against attacks, not weaker.

      Now, the hawks pretend that something fundamental changed, and so they are getting the public up against crypto. There are no new arguments, there has not been any surprises, it is just that the hawks has got the uninformed public behind them, whereas previously, the public didn't care.

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  5. from the article by truesaer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It is not a large operation, with an annual budget of less than $2 million, 15 employees and dozens of volunteers and interns, supported by 5,000 members.


    I'm hardly in a financial position to do so, but this has finally convinced me to join the EFF. With all the old cases, plus everything new the USA PATRIOT act put into place, they need all the help they can get....


    Please consider doing so as well.

  6. Access denied by Chelloveck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.eff.org/

    Error
    FW-1 at mxwzeb01f: Access denied.

    My company's proxy blocks access to the EFF web site. They also block access to the ACLU's site. I'm sure this says something. (Most likely that our IT department never bothered to change the default filter list from the vendor.)

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    1. Re:Access denied by Chelloveck · · Score: 3

      Actually, I keep an SSH connection open to my home machine, using port forwarding to a Squid proxy running there. When I need access to a blacklisted site I just point my browser's proxy settings to the appropriate port and I'm free to go where I want. My sysadmin (who has no control over the company's firewall settings) is cool with this. I just keep telling her, "Be glad I'm one of the good guys!"

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    2. Re:Access denied by arkanes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it says even more about the vendor, that they would include those sites in the default filter....

  7. Matching contributions by isa-kuruption · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For those of us who work for companies which match finantial donations to non-profits, please feel free as I shall, to (ab)use this privaledge in having your company donate your matching donation to the EFF.

    Go ahead! Put your fortune 500 in a tight spot!

  8. Re:Verio censoring John Gilmore's email by SimHacker · · Score: 3
    John Gilmore's problem is censorship, and the difference between him and Cathy C is how much of his own energy, time and money he's put into practically and legally fighting it.

    He co-founded the internet service provider Little Garden, that he originally ran in his basement. The official policy of Little Garden was that they would not censor communications. Now that Verio owns it, they have reniged on that policy, and they are now blocking the email of Little Garden's original customers, including John Gilmore's.

    Other achievements that distinguish him are that he started the "alt" newsgroup hierarchy, and founded EFF. He consistently fights against censorship, investing millions of his own dollars to support free speech and fight government oppression.

    -Don

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  9. Read it, lived it, and I did make a difference! by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's one of the high points of my life that The Electronic Frontier Foundation honored me with a 2001 Pioneer Award
    (even if my former colleague Michael Sims did later publicly proclaim he regretted nominating me, and my award probably didn't get any Slashdot coverage because of What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org))

    It's possible to make a difference. Though it's a lot of work, sometimes a lot of risk, and it isn't easy. EFF has made a difference in my life, and in many other people's lives.

  10. My Congressman Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I collared my Representative, Bob Goodlatte (R-Roanoke, VA) TWICE at functions and was told bluntly that nobody cared about the DMCA and copyright. Literally, he cut me off and said, "No one cares about that." I was stupified each time; I wish I had a good rejoinder or comment. And for what it's worth, both times I was in business casual and _polite_. (Both quite rare for me, btw.)

    So, whadda I do? I've thought about writing him, but wouldn't this be a wasted effort? In contrast, the Congressman in the next district over is Rick Boucher who is extremely clued in. I could probably give boucher time or money, but what do I do about my own Representative?

  11. EFF personel by thumbtack · · Score: 3, Informative

    At the Future of Music Conference in Washington DC I had the opportunity and privilage to meet both Robin Gross and Fred Von Lohmann, two of the EFF's lawyers. Both asked tough questions during the Copyright Panel which featured Bruce Lehman (the guy from the Clinton Administration that was responsible for writing the infamous "white paper" that the DMCA was derived from.) Both have razor sharp minds, think outside of the proverbial box, and are extremely passionate about their work. My $100 donation was well spent, but they always need more to fight the deep pocketed corporations that are constantly assailing your online rights. Put up a blue ribbon, and donate..It's worth it.

  12. How about addresing the cause, not the symptoms? by 3seas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Using 9/11 as an excuse is like addressing the symptoms, not the cause.

    access the links you find here And the links you find at those links.

    What you will find is that there was alot of reason for 9/11 to have happen and even the education and seeding needed for it to happen.
    A great deal of everything from motive to do, to education on how to do it was supplied by the US.

    These are FACTS, not my opinion, follow the links and see how deep that rabbit hole really goes.

    I seem to preceive the EFF as having become a political legal manipulation machine that can easily become out of touch with the individual human party of us all that they are claiming to represent.

    The ACLU ignores any case that doesn't present them with some self promotion mechanism. In fact they dismiss even simple request for simple legal referal with their mass produced post card stating they are not currently interested in the case. (which has nothing to do with responding to a simple legal referal request)

    I suspect the EFF is following such a direction.
    Sorry, I really wish I was wrong about this but I don't think I am.

    Concider "To high-tech pros and policy wonks, the EFF is well-known for its opposition to the regulation of encryption. Hollywood and the publishing industry know it as the loyal opposition in battles over digital copy law, which the EFF believes is so restrictive that it frustrates innovation."

    LOYAL OPPOSITION??? does this mean the EFF would fumble the ball intentionally under the right conditions?

    A flag with stars of company logos? Like Time Warner?

    What's real on the Electronic Frontier?

    How about the fact that computer are all about automaion. The automaion of complexity that is made up of simpler things, so as to make reuse or use again easier for the party use it?

    The software industry can automate anything, includng human ability to balance and move (the Segway), but what's the deal with it' apparent inability to automate programing even in fundamental ways that the user can apply?

    If the Electronic Frontier Fondation is really about our freedoms in the electronic frontier, then where is the hardware and software components, the modularity and ease of use and creation (putting things together, automating) for the users, the consumer to apply as they see fit or need?

    Instead you have a flag with company logos for stars.

    Need to see more? try my journal here on slashdot as well as my recent posts here, or my web pages..

    Don't be fooled as to what freedom is in this electronic frontier, by those who present themselves as representing you. Instead make them represent you correctly.

    Get to the causes, stop treating the symptoms that will never go away untill to get to the cause.

  13. John Barlow's Own Account by ancarett · · Score: 3, Interesting

    More details from one of the EFF co-founders: A Not Terribly Brief History of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

    In it you can read Barlow's firsthand account of his interview with that FBI agent which helped spark the creation of the EFF: He had been sent to find out if I might be a member of the NuPromtheus League, a dread band of info-terrorists (or maybe just a disaffected former Apple employee) who had stolen and wantonly distributed source code normally used in the Macintosh ROMs. Agent Baxter's errand was complicated by a fairly complete unfamiliarity with computer technology. I realized right away that before I could demonstrate my innocence, I would first have to explain to him what guilt might be.

    The last two sentences still ring true for technologists today!

    --
    ancarett, historian and zombie gamer
  14. protecting "freedom" by shomon2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    How can a society based on freedom protect itself by sacrificing liberties? But how can it protect itself without such sacrifices?


    This little quote stuck with me. The wisest answer would have been not to turn that corner. But maybe growth comes from going through this kind of problem too.

    I may be a troll in saying this, but I'm one of many chileans who left my home country through a coup organised for a different 11th of september, in part by the pentagon and the CIA, in part by lobbying organisations with lost interests in a left wing chile, and in part by chileans.

    What "freedom" were those organisations protecting? To what extent did they go?

    I don't have a problem with americans though. I think it's a nice, albeit twisted country, my life has taken me always closer to it, still trying to understand.I'd ask people who really believe in this "freedom" thing to read up a bit on history. Try latin american history for starters. The 70s, the "National Security Doctrine". Don't worry about chile. Try Guatemala and clinton's apology. Try argentina, cuba, panama. Then look up US interests in other parts of the world. Foreign Debt, the international criminal court and Bush's reasons for opposing it(monsanto?).

    The US doesn't bother me. You bring together the dreams of so many peoples. This small mindedness, ignorance, is the same as that of the british of the past few centuries, or any "empires" before. We all share those traits. It's just the same problems as ever, but maybe, the US will be the place where we, humanity, will finally solve these problems.

    As for sacrificing liberties, try cause and effect, or "do unto others" as the christian view of it is. It's a simple concept. Any power that lives in fear of the outside will not last.

    Bottom line is, this kind of thing is up to people. Individuals. Not agencies or organisations. If America is really free, then the agencies and corporations will listen to those like the EFF who apply their knowledge and their wisdom for the good of everyone, and to those who silently support them with votes, ethical choices, expressed opinions, and dialogue.
  15. Ditto: Re:My Congressman Sucks by garyrich · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mine sucks worse than yours. I've written to mine. He (Howard "Buck Mckeon R-CA) doesn't just blow me off with "nobody cares" but actively works for the other side. He could care less what I think. I didn't vote for him and he doesn't care about that, he has a safe seat. All I can do is work for whoever opposes him, even though they don't stand a chance against his campaign warchest.

    Could be worse, my sister and mother live in Mary Bono's (formerly Sonny's widow) district.

    the process isn't working and hasn't been for a long time

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan